Can Facts Slow the DNC Breach Runaway Train?
medium.com
medium.com
I know that sounds facetious, but I'm being sincere: three major intelligence organizations from the US government said in very strong terms that their concurring opinion is Russian intelligence hacked the DNC and conducted PSYOPs against the US election. My experience with US intelligence personnel is that they're competent, reasonable people who sincerely want to help the country, even if they're prone to being overzealous in their actions.
I have no idea who this guy is or why I should care what he has to say. To be honest, the post reads as considerably less professional and well reasoned than other discussion of the issue, and I'm skeptical of the sincerity -- the standards of proof are ridiculous, there's no direct refutation, and it reads like it's meant to sow doubt.
So why isn't this at best a contractor looking to cash in by going against the grain and at worst another PSYOP?
The three intelligence agencies that issued their concurring opinion didn't actually do any investigating; they took the CrowdStrike report of the incident at face value.
Which, itself, means that the government's conclusions are only as good as CrowdStrike's conclusions. So the real question to ask is whether or not you should trust this guy over CrowdStrike.