Yes, Garfinkel, et al., don't know what a "client" and "server" are.
Yes, Garfinkel, et al., don't know what a "client" and "server" are.
What do you think "client" and "server" mean, and what do you think is wrong with that paragraph-length footnote (besides its length)?
Could you please try to rewrite it more accurately or in fewer words?
The X use of "client" and "server" is correct. The "remote machine"/"local machine" thing isn't.
See my other reply: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13783802
Edit: Forgot to refer to you as Al. (Dang it, this is why I can't have nice jokes.) Apologies!
It makes sense when one thinks about it, but it's still strange until one gets used to it.
The X server is called a server because it is a server and X clients are clients.
It's excusable to be confused by the terminology, as in the quote, of course. Unless you claim to understand the whole "network" thing.