1 thing that US propagandists consistently fail to mention about China's emissions is that, per capita, they are less than half of those of the United States. If you mention that, they accuse you of "whataboutism" as if comparing the total emissions of Austin, TX and Los Angeles is a reasonable and totally not intentionally deceptive thing to do.

It's biased to refer to a system that expects countries with far less per capita emissions to reduce at the same rate as countries with two or three times their rates as "bifurcated." "Bifurcated" could just as easily refer to the rate of the reduction, or to the per capita targets of that reduction. The system can't help but be bifurcated when dealing with polluters as bad as the United States.

It's a paranoid work of art to both make China out to be a threat because it could pollute too much, and also a threat because it could develop green technology and apply it too quickly, in the same document.