Hacker News Reader

I agree with that in general but having your monitoring system be dependent on the thing it monitors is a pretty big goof. It possible that the dependency was very non-obvious and many layers deep, which is more understandable, but still...its pretty fundamental.

View on HN

The monitoring system was not dependent on the thing it was monitoring.

The website that shows the public results of the monitoring, which is updates only by humans, depended on it.

An important distinction but doesn't negate the ideas that their users should be in the dark because of something this stupid.

They have a twitter account for such incidents and used it appropriately. They did not slack in relaying the outage to customers, and between that and the fact that no S3 services were operating I think the message was pretty clear: "We fucked up, give us a couple hours"

I'm, I don't understand.

My us-east-1 RSS feed said S3 had no incidents.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com