Not true: https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2015/10/08/npapi-plu...
Not true: https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2015/10/08/npapi-plu...
Also, they recommend installing IE. So I'm assuming Edge isn't supported either? This is a horrible approach to browser security coming from Google.
https://www.cnet.com/news/in-chrome-googles-hangouts-plugin-...
[1] https://support.google.com/hangouts/answer/1361676?hl=en
Sucks though, Firefox probably could have make a longer exception for them if it mattered to them.
Can we get more people to "hijack 'open'"? Can "'open' hijackers" become the new "rockstar developers?"
E.g. in retrospect, I wish I never bought into the Google ecosystem as much as I did, convenient though as it was. There are parts of it that I dislike or outright hate now, but the inconvenience of switching away is greater (yes, I've tried), so now I mostly just grumble quietly.
Then I spent about a decade and a half trying to embrace alternatives and I concluded that software that handles general use cases is actually a hard, specialized-skillset problem, and there's a lot of benefit to the full-stack control (and large developer culture, and multi-decade legacy history of successful product) that a long-legacy monoculture provides. Most of the friction is in wanting to use something that isn't in your monoculture, and trying to solve that by building a more general solution really just adds another monoculture to be incompatible with your favorite one (see https://xkcd.com/927/). Virtualization has basically solved that rare problem in my use-case.
To each their own, of course; I got bored with the game of making the computer architecture work over paying someone else to do that and then using the computer to make things.