Most of the rain seems to run on a bridge from the top of the country to the bottom.
In the process of drilling a tunnel over 100' under ground (because the existing elevated road can't withstand another earthquake) several older buildings began to shift at the surface. Downtown Seattle is extremely unstable and I'm not confident that the structures in the city are prepared for the type of quake we are about to face. Japan has had a lot of wake up calls and as far as I know has done a lot more preparation.
Before we spend a few billion dollars on a train maybe we should spend some of that cash on making sure our apartments and offices don't end up in Lake Union or Elliott Bay.
(I did the research on this last year after I had a nightmare about tsunamis.)
If we're going to build such a train it needs to be engineered to be safe from the faults along the cascadia subduction zone - that may be no small feat.
Earthquakes sure, volcanoes...Rainier popping its top could take out the whole city. But it is pretty safe from giant waves.
Large parts of Seattle are fill and are at a significant risk of land slide in case of a major quake.
StClaire did not suggest a tsunami risk to Seattle.
* Almost nobody.