Hacker News Reader

I think this guy is just wrong, except maybe in saying that `log` is ambiguous and we should be using `log10` and `ln`. Incidentally he uses comma as both a thousand separator and a decimal point in the article.

View on HN

I am afraid I am not. I wish I was, as it would save me ridiculous amount of time and work.

Start reading here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein_pKa_calculations

This is just the tip of the "log(x) vs ln(x)" iceberg.

I have copy pasted the ln(10) straight from Apple Calc. Thanks for pointing out.

I mean in your assertion that `log` must mean `log10`. I have huge sympathy for contending with inconsistent use of ambiguous notation. My pet hate is `gamma` vs. `tgamma`.

I wouldn't dare to suggest that, yet that's the route that physics and all derivatives have adopted!

We are essentially at the crossroad and obviously, programming, which develops nowadays a bit faster than theoretical physics or mathematics, pushes in one direction.

Well my anecdatum, as a theoretical physicist, is that people very rarely write `log` or use logarithms is bases other than e.

I had a one more look at the article, and you are right! I need to add an log(10) = 2.303 example

Reply on news.ycombinator.com