This has the advantage that even posting much the same comment into different subreddits using different accounts in each subreddit is detected.
This is the danger with just being in an echo chamber, because you yourself become part of the echo.
I thinks the problem; many browsers don't care to fact check, or even click through to the articles underneath. Indeed I just scroll through the list a few times throughout the day, and might click on anything that sounds interesting. But with the constant and obvious BS it all gets a bit tiresome. If there was an alternative site where they had rules in place to deal with the problem, I'd switch in a heartbeat.
It's pretty obvious first comments on HN that are generally upvotable tend to accumulate views, votes, and thereby become undisplacable from the top of the sort. In addition to drowning out lower comments as threads aren't collapsed.
From a pure game perspective, not reading the article / skimming and posting a comment as quickly as possible strictly dominates reading the article, if you're optimizing for karma.
https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/5vwt2g/israel_de...
Top thread (minus auto-summary bot's) erroneously declares the title misleading.
The thread under that amplifies some seemingly very flakey accusations a different employee at that organization maintains ties to a terrorist organization renounced decades ago.
Derail accomplished! Threads about Russia being bad usually lead with how the US is bad. Threads about Syria often debate whether Bashar al-Assad is not so bad. I am usually annoyed I read the comments in that subreddit.
Look at this awesome 2 day old account's comments -
https://i.redditmedia.com/C87zcWzT3KPN0Sdo4YfMIe2Rd0oLWTwBsX...
Sometimes the fake accounts will even have identical comments and only post in each others comment chains.