Oh it's general. Apart from anything else, a majority of all scientific papers rely on some form of software, be it simple R statistical scripts, to complex programs. None of those programs ever have bugs in them, right?

Then to be fair to the authors, scientific papers follow a fairly fixed format, often with hard limits on paper length (cf. Nature, etc.). Putting all the detail necessary for replication, and a decent literature review, and an overview , is simple not possible.

And then the meta-problem - which is general - every aspect of science from hiring to grant writing, to managing a phd. farm, to goofing off on ycombinator..., essentially works against anybody trying to do detailed, methodical, provable work, no matter how brilliant they are, because doing all aspects of science properly is incredibly time consuming in a world with an ever reducing attention span.