Y Combinator Demo Day Roundup
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
Slicehost LLC 6
tipjoy.com
baseshield.com
mightyquiz.com
insoshi.com
stanfordturf.com
280slides.com
Amazon.com, Inc. 4
8aweek.com
webmynd.com
deluux.com
wundrbar.com
SoftLayer Technologies Inc. 3
snaptalent.com
chatterous.com
omnisio.com
Peer 1 Network Inc. 2
rescuetime.com
addher.com
HERAKLES LLC 1
mixwit.com
Hollywood Interactive, Inc. 1
yumdots.com-RescueTime (So freaking valuable!)
-Kirkland North (definitely going to grow their userbase quickly! (once they launch))
-Chatterous (Because I had a very similar idea)
-------------------------------------------------
My notes are to:
-insoshi (you have an indirect competitor, lovdbyless, it's a rails based opensource social network maker thing)
-deluux (my first interpretation of what you guys do was a single login for every site (like openID or w/e) but then my second interpretation was that I can show my facebook page or elements from it, on my own site? Like a widget(s)? That would be awesome!)
-joberator(i think we simply need more developers, not referrals, because, at least in S. Florida, finding a developer through craigslist, career builder or monster is NOT easy, and my CS major friends dont have any referrals, period and they are in their last year of college, so I have to wait for them to graduate which is not sufficient)
-wundrbar(dont know if this is possible, but if you could simply be an option in the dropdown that accompanies that search box in top right of FireFox and IE7, that would ROCK MY FREAKING WORLD!)
Interesting. Our app is also in Rails, so it could actually help us a lot to have another project with complementary code. Any idea what their license is? There's almost nothing about them yet on Google. (I found the site of the guys who make it, but they don't list lovdbyless yet.)
It was supposed to be released under MIT license.. from what they were saying.
We have a global and pretty ambitious vision - its how hotjobs started, we're aiming to be even bigger in this phase of the web.
Another big one, I think, is SnapTalent. The existing system of finding people to work is pretty much an "offline approach" ported over the net. SnapTalent actually uses the technology to improve the effectiveness of the process. I only hope that their users (companies) will be smart enough to recognize the potential. If I were monster.com (are they still around?) I'd grabbed these guys immediately.
I like the basic principle of aggregating micropayments, but I think TipJoy going to be very limited until people can actually get money out (which of course means that TipJoy has to deal with the regulatory issues). So far they've accumulated $1531.54 in tips (assuming their website is up to date), which means that their 3% cut adds up to a grand total of $45.95... which isn't going to make anyone rich in a hurry.
Can TipJoy get big enough fast enough?
Well, that changes things. :-)
You can give far more than $0.10. That is just the default. It is really simple to give up to $10, and we might raise or remove that limit.
Also, we earn interest on money in our system. That makes the earnings closer to 6%. But we don't take a cut per tip, only on cash-out. This means that if A tips B who then tips C, each of those tips is overhead free. If C cashes out, we take a cut. The potential for a zero overhead transaction system is huge.
But that's not a really good comparison especially if Tipjoy is dealing directly in money while google was search. Having said that, maybe Tipjoy is onto something because the last micro-payment startup to do something interesting was paypal which started 10 years ago.
In fact, RescueTime & 8AWeek also sound awfully similar, don't they? This raises an interesting question. As number of YC companies increases, the chances of "collision" increases too. How is that handled?
But the main focus of the companyis this Javascript library for writing desktop apps, so that seems very much not-Zenter.
RescueTime and 8aweek are also quite different: RT is for people and groups who want to track their productivity, and 8aweek is an alternative to blacklist-based web filtering.
Our answer to the problem of collisions is that in any large market, which we encourage startups to be in, there is going to be room for several different approaches.
Does anyone know if there is some automated reason this might have happened?
on paper some of these seem like hacker projects not startups so I would love to see how they see value in these startups.
There isn't any video. If you're curious about one in particular, contact them. They're all stand up folks.
edit: removed google from the above list.
Hacker project:
"Google began in January 1996 as a research project by Larry Page, a Ph.D. student at Stanford.[1] In search for a dissertation theme, Page decided to explore the mathematical properties of the World Wide Web, understanding its link structure as a huge graph.[2] His supervisor Terry Winograd agreed and Page focused on the problem of finding out which web pages link to a given page, considering the number and nature of such backlinks to be valuable information about that page (with the role of citations in academic publishing in mind).[2] In his research project, nicknamed "BackRub", he was soon joined by Sergey Brin, a fellow Stanford Ph.D. student and close friend, whom he had first met in the summer of 1995 in a group of potential new students which Brin had volunteered to show around the campus.[2]"
Asked of previous demo days, and the standard answer has been "no" - probably due to companies not yet ready for release. I thought the purpose of demo day was to allow VC's a sneek look at the latest YC recruits not a general public launch.
Are 3-8 minute sessions any indication of success? My site gets over 10 minutes right now.