However, it was overwhelmingly a successful Games. It created a lasted economic boom, and much of the construction saw continued use or was repurposed afterward.
Today, Atlanta is not really remembered as a "bad" Olympics (because international sports organizatinos like the IOC and FIFA have become more disgustingly capitalistic than we ever were). We are likewise not really remembered as an "success" story either, frankly because most cultural commentary prefers not to think about southern American cities at all outside the context of sweeping generalizations about racism (1). But quietly, it was an example of a success story for the host city.
(1) Yeah, between the '96 Games and this year's Super Bowl, Atlanta sports fans are a pretty bitter crowd. Don't mind us!
The aquatic center is still in use at GA Tech. And Tech also got a lot of new housing from the Olympic Village, and a nice new student center.
The Olympic Stadium turned into Turner Field, which will now be a stadium for GA State University.
I believe the velodrome is still in use, although not totally sure about that.
Basically, Atlanta planned very well for the post-Olympic legacy. And I think we threw a pretty good Olympics, all in all. Yeah, there was lots of advertising, but because of it, the city didn't go into tremendous debt.
Plus our opening ceremonies were the world debut of wacky waving inflatable arms guy, so that's gotta count for something.
I also used the aquatic center a couple times to practice kayaking. The coolest part about that pool was you could lower the floor.
- The main stadium is now the local football team's home ground and gets used for concerts as well.
- The olympic pool is an open public pool that anyone can use and looks like it gets a fair amount of use.
- The park itself is a nice open space to be in with lots more flats and shops being built in and around it.
- I have several colleagues who train at the velodrome.
- The athletes housing created thousands of new flats that, are pretty much filled and provided a lot of homes for low income families.
I really like living in Stratford and I don't think I would like it anywhere near as much if the olympics hadn't been there.
> The games set back Sochi $51 billion, London $11.6 billion and Beijing at least $40 billion
That is no small amount, I wonder how much of it was corruption and bad management.
Entering the swimming hall we immediately wanted to go swimming (but sadly didn’t have the proper gear with us). When you enter the hall you overlook the Olympic pool (there is no wall or glass separating you from the noise and the smell) and that’s very tempting.
If you visit Munich I would recommend visiting the Olympic Park, but do bring you bathing things, just in case.
During the summer we go there a lot the playgrounds and gardens are gorgeous. Yes, a lot of the temporary venues have gone and there is a vigorous building programme, building both flats and office space.
https://www.olympic.org/news/sydney-s-olympic-venues-provide...
http://theconversation.com/hosting-the-olympics-cash-cow-or-...
http://economicstudents.com/2016/09/road-ruin-economic-case-...
There are actually a lot of academic studies now into the Sydney 2000 Olympics economics. Quite interesting.
Most of the facilities are running events full time and many events that used to to be hosted further to the east of the city are now at Olympic park due to the ease of transport and centrality to the majority of the population.
Personally I think the Olympics are a complete joke and totally corrupted by bribes, commercialism and professional sport. They are long past their use by date and bound to take a hit when corruption becomes more unacceptable in more places, but, the facilities built for Sydney do not belong in an essay like this.
There are definitely some winners post-Olympics, but honestly I don't think they make sense anymore. Seems that Olympics has gone down the wrong path in so many ways with the demands from the IOC requiring bigger and bigger budgets, private organizations taking stricter and stricter control over content even social media that it's just not the same any more when compared to 20+ years ago.
I remember feeling an emotion for the older Olympics that's just not there as much anymore.
I think winter olympics are much easier to run sustainably than summer games since there are far fewer sports, and the ones that do exist don't require nearly the same level of specialized venues. Bobsled and ski jump are pretty unique, but other than that everything needed for winter games is highly reusable. Most of the venues are not even that seasonal with the right planning.
Calgary is in an excellent position to host winter games. The venues that have been maintained and used for nearly 30 years and the city has excellent light rail transit to move between venues. Calgary is used to opening its doors to millions of visitors in a short time every year thanks to the Stampede, so the is a huge volunteer core and tons of hotel space. There have been calls for permanent olympic venues to help hold down costs; I think you'd be hard pressed to find a better option than Calgary for the winter games.
- The Oval still hosts world cup speed skating. - Canome still has a world class x-country ski facility - Lake Louise still hosts world cup downhill (although it was not used during the 88 games). - We have an NHL sized arena, although there is work to build a new one. - MacMahon stadium could still host an opening ceremonies - Bobsleigh still hosts world cup bobsleigh, skeleton and luge - Calgary Olympic Park holds world cup aerials, moguls, snowboarding half pipe etc
The biggest change from 88 is the size of the crowds. The city would likely need a few more hotel rooms to house athletes and visitors, but that's easy. Our new international terminal just opened so we could handle the increased capacity.
They're going to re-purpose the whole thing for the winter Olympics. I think it's supposed to become the curling venue.