If your "ideas" are in conflict with facts, get better ideas.
Spend a few hours investigating "facts" and arguments on all sides and smell where the bullshit is.
Generally speaking, the physical sciences produce highly peaked distributions (literally, in the case of particle physics) and the social sciences produce more of what I would call flat lines with a few lumps in them. That includes most political "facts". Quantitative accuracy requires extremely high quality data and statistical inference, which when applied to social issues is impractical for the foreseeable future.
I propose we roast you with some honey.
Your strenuous disagreement is a clear indication that you are intolerant of alternative viewpoints.