>"Given how glacial rocketry progress was by early 2000 it's no wonder people from outside of the industry were pretty annoyed, not to say more."
I think this is on the money. I think people might get more interested commercially if getting out of LEO per attempt was more reliable vs the current focus on bringing the cost's down with typical systems we have been using in rocketry (which seem to not have increased the reliability). It would be really cool if we heard about advancements in alternative exit strategies[0][1], but it seems we're still far off.
I'm personally the most interested in electromagnetic rail assist for the first stage, with some sort of scram jet for the second stage, best most practical stuff will remain classified military research (looking at the US Naval programs) and the public ONR[2] reports still bring up issues as far as durability of rails over repeated use which probably is going to require some major break through in HEP & matsci.
With the Falcon 9 current specs, the first stage takes about 162 burn time, and assuming its traveling roughly at 1.66 km/s[3], its first stage travels to around around 270 km (ISS is at about 400km in LEO) with a max paylod of about 2.28 * 10^4 kg, I don't wanna be anywhere near the launch of the kinetic EM slug that needs to have at at least ~60,340 MJ of PE between the 1st-2nd stage transition (setting aside any given directional vectors, and if present or near present scramjet array could support such payload). The navy doesn't even expect a 32MJ weapon until mid 2020[5], so who knows, maybe if I can be alive in 60-80 years, we will have built huge CSP arrays in the middle of the desert to be able to launch things into LEO with more reliability.
But another hundred years of redox seems more likely.
[0] https://www.nasa.gov/topics/technology/features/horizontalla...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-rocket_spacelaunch
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railgun#Outstanding_issues_in_...
[3] https://www.quora.com/How-fast-does-the-first-stage-of-Falco...
[4] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcon_9
[5] https://news.usni.org/2015/04/14/navsea-details-at-sea-2016-...