International visitors are already turning their back on Trump-era America
economist.com
economist.com
But I'd argue that even before the Trump administration, the USA was immensely difficult to travel to for anyone in a country that's not part of their visa waiver program. USA is one of the few places to require a transit visa even if you only connect at one of their airports and visa arrangements have exorbitant fees attached to them. They have a perception abroad of having stressful border control - even so for Canadians who arguably enjoy the easiest access to the US compared to any other country.
It certainly doesn't help to have higher minimum salaries for work visas and a possibility of being kicked out after completing a degree on study permits, which affect business and student visitors respectively. And finally, dealing with American companies from abroad can be a huge resource commitment as you often have to adopt American standards and clearances in parallel to other internationally adopted schemes or your own local one. But for a long time, the costs justified the prospects of visiting, simply because of the access you get to American markets. With Trump adopting "America first", a lot of people will just not bother deal with travelling to the USA anymore.
As far as fluff pieces go, this is one of the fluffiest. A mere 2 weeks after the decree, based on internet searches and no actual numbers, not controlled with anything (except last year's results), and with the bs hint at Trump as "russian led" -- whereas an explanation (assuming the numbers are correct" is much more obvious: that a President who is not openly cold-war hostile to Russia might bring in more interest for tourism from there.
All anecdotal - but enough anecdotal evidence gathered together becomes a groundswell action...
[0] - http://www.perthnow.com.au/sport/football/former-sydney-fc-s...
And there is another interesting metric to watch, the number of US citizens who choose to renounce US citizenship. There has been an emorrage under Obama's regime http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-09/record-number-ameri...
Not all echo chambers are illegitimate.
(Heck, aside from Math, Physics and so called "hard sciences" science itself is often hardly scientific: riddled with special interests, tenured idiots, ideology, profit motives, etc).
A lot of the cherished facts thrown around in politics and social issues can be (and are) made up, even if they come from censuses, public bureaus, NGOs, the OECD, the UN and other seemingly trusted sources.
And even when the facts are hard and solid, their interpretation, or the consensus on the best course of action, can differ widely.
As of course does the impact of those facts to various groups (the same social phenomenon, new law, technological change etc can make some richer and other poorer for example).
An echo chamber in social life is never, ever, legitimate.
>the day Lokey left Zero Hedge—their relationship had deteriorated significantly, according to the messages provided by Ivandjiiski.
“I can’t be a 24-hour cheerleader for Hezbollah, Moscow, Tehran, Beijing, and Trump anymore. It’ s wrong. Period. I know it gets you views now, but it will kill your brand over the long run,” Lokey texted Ivandjiiski. “This isn’t a revolution. It’s a joke.”
-- Former ZeroHedge writer Colin Lokey [0]
As an American, I really can't support the promotion of an often-explicitly anti-American blog that has a tenuous relationship with the actual facts.
[0] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-29/unmasking...
As a non American, I can fully support the promotion of counterviews on Hezbollah, Moscow, Tehran, Beijing, and Trump (and other places, like Latin American) than the ones played by official American media, which is no better than the never ending "our country, right or wrong" at best, and openly lying or uncritically republishing "WMDs" to sponsor some new war at worse.
Because I've visited the US many times, and it was just fine, a great country, an excellent countryside and nice people (including the occasional jerks).
And the same is true for MILLIONS of tourists that visit the US each year. People here are concerned about things that might or might not happen to 0.001% of travelers or less... It's not like NY for example stopped getting a million or so visitors each month from abroad (12.7 international visitors per year just for NYC).
It's a shame, because most of the conferences I'm interested in are there or Europe, and Europe is very far from where I live. Unfortunately any measures that get pushed through now (e.g. requiring social media passwords) will probably take a very long time to get rolled back post-Trump, if they ever do.
I know of several businesses that have chosen not to send their staff to the USA anymore to trade shows or clients. My company used to send someone to a media summit every year. Last time they declined the visa for that person without providing any reason. It makes no sense. The focus is shifting: the US used to be the biggest market that everyone strived to cater to. Not anymore. Banks are more and more reluctant to use USD, Euro is preferred. When I go to a bank anywhere in the world I suddenly have to fill out a questionaire about not being a US citizen, having no phone number there, never having lived there and on and on. I have nothing to do with the US so why are they bothering me with this crap? Imagine if every country requested such a thing, you'd sit there a week answering questions. Oh and banks in Asia are starting to not take on US customers at all from what I heard.
When even people like Adi Shamir (the S in RSA) are having issues obtaining visas (https://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/2013/10/shamir/), something must be completely wrong with the way immigration is handled.
I hope the USA can turn this ship around, right now it looks like it's heading directly for the iceberg with full throttle.
I believe this is because IRS went down on the US sections of international banks and fined them for their non-US sections having helped "US persons" to evade taxes. Remember that the USA are one of the few countries in the world that make people pay taxes anywhere in the world even if they do not have anything to do with the US besides holding a US passport or permanent residence.
Edit: It's called FATCA, more info e.g. here: http://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/102915...
There is a lot of can-do here in Eastern EU compared to old-Europe. I had all sorts of jobs including diving instructor, then deep sea saturation diver and life support technician on offshore rigs in South East Asia. I made a boatload of money always doing what I loved and never listening to anyone else (especially not those who said it was better to lead a stable life in Austria). (I look back at these people today and can only feel sorry for them since they only know a life of fear (thanks to social and environmental conditioning that turned them into these sad characters they are).
If I look how the US treats their people with majority of the poor and black population incarcerated ... (and how they lock the middle class into their system with double taxation for those who dare to try their luck overseas) ... no thanks. The US is so badly broken that fixing it is not something that my generation will witness in it's lifetime.
I was supposed to relocate to Boston exactly now. But I changed my mind because I will not support this regime. My opinion is that if you are an American citizen currently not burning your flag in the street you are part of the problem. I would be totally the wrong person to uphold any of the fucking hypocritic values the US expects me to subscribe to when entering that country.
Also I threw the towel as engineering director in a Boston based Tech incubator for the same reason. I am not siding with racism/bigotry. The only way to have peace of mind is to ignore anything that comes out of the US as much as possible. I also make an active effort to watch what products I buy to ensure that as little money as possible goes from me to any US based business.
I also wanted to come in the U.S. again at least once or twice for tourism (once with my family to visit my old coworkers at the east coast, once with my coworkers to visit the national parks in the west), but I am also considering that, short-term.
And everyone wants to blame Trump for it, however, it started under Obama.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/exclusive-homeland-security-rejec...
(first proposed in 2011)
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/san-bernardino-shooting/mor...
https://fcw.com/articles/2016/09/19/social-media-immigration...
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/09/cbp-fails-meaningfully...
It's only made bigger news in recent weeks.
CBP has been digging at electronic devices for years.
https://www.elsevier.com/connect/what-are-your-rights-at-air...
however, the US definitely isn't the only country doing this.
But asking for social media passwords, yeah, that crosses the line. Will they also want to visit my apartment?
The only thing that will is the dismantling of this "security circus" called TSA.
one more reason to not visit amazing country where during transfer to third country through US airport you must pass through immigration
Said that I'm going next week to Chicago.
I would have expected such a drop already after the NSA's various mass surveillance programs became public knowledge.