Imagine someone records police violence and posts it online. Only they cut off the first half where the suspect did not comply and was aggressive.
Now there's an angry Internet mob which crowdsources the address, phone and a lot more, just from the recording of the police officer's face.
Sadly, in our time and age, it's the first one to report that has the patent to "truth".
E. g. your significant other sees you somewhere you should have not been.
I honestly don't have the answer. Hopefully, the police can keep them stashed for when they're needed.
I'd like to get the media outlets and public more educated. To get the story confirmed or denied (by the police).
Maybe a few "police cameras (again) prove wrong accusations" with wide coverage would go a long way to discourage fabricated stories.
Now about the access and publishing. That one is the hardest to get right considering presumption of innocence and privacy.
The only idea for now "here is the recording, faces blurred. If it's not enough, we'll gladly see you in court. What? No court? We didn't think so either." Hopefully I can come up with a better one.
I'm almost asleep, but there probably is some sort of solution that would prove the authenticity of the recording.