Humans Never Stopped Evolving (2016)
the-scientist.com
the-scientist.com
If someone claimed to possess evidence that we did stop, that is a paper I should read with interest.
Even the introduction of birth control is likely to lead to or has already started to lead to evolution. Women allow men to procreate after much more time and stop anti-conception only when a man has proven himself (at least to a higher degree than say 100ths of years ago). This will probably lead to short term behavioral/cultural differences but it is fun to think what it may do in the long term. One can go on for a long time doing such though experiments.
People also often think evolution has some "forward" direction but if being short, ugly and smelly suddenly confers a reproductive advantage, natural selection will favor short, smelly, ugly people. It's all about niches and fitness in terms of "fitting".
"Humans Once Actually Thought They Stopped Evolving (2216)"
Erstwhile successful mating traits have chiefly been replaced by financial and social status.
Is this really the relevant criterion here? As long as it doesn't lead to badly reduced reproduction, these properties will remain within our human gene pool, and that's all we need to evolve.
I'm not sure it's the relevant criterion, but it probably is one.
For instance in the original article, they talk about lactose tolerance and how up to 30% of the adult population currently tolerates lactose. They would not have mentioned this ratio it if it were not important.
If new mutations show up and barely keep existing without gaining any predominance, isn't it more genetic drift than evolution?
But there are many other instances where it's a whole set of variants affecting a particular trait, all of which get slightly increased in frequency to collectively sculpt humans to their local environment; this is much harder to detect because the increase in each variant is much smaller. But it's still doable, especially with whole genomes, so look forward to more discoveries in the next few years.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/2008/08/21/michael-phelps-unint...
Strictly in the scientific definition of evolution.
Certain genes proliferate more effectively in their environments. Therefore the population evolves.
People imagine evolution to be faster/stronger/better/smarter. Sure, often it's related to that - but it is not necessary.