Hacker News Reader

Comment by simonh | Hacker News Reader

I can't speak for the developers, but the reason I appreciate it and projects like it is the journey they're on. The things they've learned about Windows and it's apps, the skills they've developed, the community they've built. That on it's own is worthy of respect even if it was not of practical value itself.

View on HN

We are all on our own journey and learned personal and professional things and skills. Except that most of us do not chase an express train that has left ten years ago.

They're chasing Windows xp which is a train that is waiting for them.

Xp is an empty station, not a train. In few years most apps and hardware will be incompatible with or not fully functional under xp (they already are in half). I'm not attacking reactos as you could think. I'm pointing to obvious facts that have to be dealt with for success.

If we skip practical part, ReactOS is great as any big community-driven project, because driving a big project is hard.

But how many companies will want a migration path from XP? More than you may think.

No (sane) company's migration path from XP is going to be to an open-source clone of XP developed by a small team, that offers them no guarantees whether it works, no support, and the possibility that development could stop at any time.

If there are no other options, they will. And investors may be willing to fund a company that can keep XP apps running long-term.

No sane company is still using Windows XP, given that support ended 3 years ago and development ended a decade ago.

Still being used in POS equipment and ATMs.

"XP embedded" is still supported and updated, afaik.

Until April 9, 2019 https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/18581/lifecycle-sup...

If I can offer you cloud-based access to a Windows app you need that no longer runs on hardware you can purchase, you don't have to know crap about what OS I'm running.

Now that's a startup idea.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com