I'm comparing interpretations of what amounts to the same action by Trump and Obama. Admittedly I'm generalizing, but the analogy is more valid than a comparison of apples to oranges. Both Trump and Obama outsourced campaign analytics to professionals, and in both cases there were articles explaining the innovation. In Trump's case, this article (and others I have seen), has a distinctly negative tone. For Obama, the articles praised his data scientists and boasted of their high post-campaign salaries.

I challenge you to find an article describing Obama's campaign analytics with similarly negative tone to this article about "weaponized AI propaganda."

The differing interpretations of two similar scenarios are worth observing, since the variability represents evidence of bias on the part of the journalists writing the articles.