OpenDNS is hijacking Google requests (For what they claim is a good reason)
blog.opendns.com
blog.opendns.com
OpenDNS becomes users DNS when they or those in charge of their network choose to use them. The results you are presented and ads are the same you would see on Google.com search engine results pages (SERP's).
Why the negativity - it's not hijacking if you open the door and invite someone to drive your car nor is it hijacking if you use OpenDNS and they help provide a better experience with typos.
If Dell would provide a first time loging dialog asking the user if he want to use google toolbar with this and this benefit it would be a much different situation.
I really don't understand where people get off preaching about other people's business decisions. In what way is Dell installing whatever software they like, on a computer they build and sell, "wrong"?
What law of nature states that computers shouldn't have logos on them? The non-t-shirt-turing-machine-no-logo law? I haven't heard of that one.
OK, I'm done now. I'm perfectly happy that you make aesthetic and technical decisions about software and hardware, but don't go calling people who engage in voluntary trade "wrong", or telling them what they should or shouldn't do.
Just Don't Buy It.
http://daringfireball.net/linked/2008/march#thu-13-opendns
I apologize for using an over inflamatory tone in my link title. I had tried to temper it with the explanation that they claim to have a good reason, but I see that this wasn't as effective as I intended.
Seems like OpenDNS is fighting fire with more fire.
This pays for the free services they provide: a) faster, more reliable DNS lookup, b) automatic phishing protection, c) optional content filtering (both blacklist and whitelist, and d) fine-grained control over lots of network preferences.
Great podcast interview with the CEO over at http://itc.conversationsnetwork.org/shows/detail3550.html . It's about an hour but it's a great listen.
You'd want to say this is a horrible precedent, but it's not unprecedented --- it's exactly what Verisign tried to pull on us a few years back.