What if you sister called and said there was a safe, cheap and effective way to remove, say, the myopia from her spawn (in the case of dogs, stop inbreeding, in the case of humans, currently imaginary)? Would you tell her not to do it?
[1] https://www.reference.com/pets-animals/much-pugs-87fd8b209ca...
http://johnhawks.net/weblog/topics/phylogeny/taxonomy/humans...
In any case, please don't promote anti-science articles (this one begins by complaining about "those who accept and promote evolution").
in any case, i think the author is very much in favour of science.
But comparing humans to dogs in that matter is kind of ridiculous. This is more like if your sister called and said "I just read about chinese foot binding, and I think it's a great idea so I'm going to do it to my children!" That's basically what people who only accept dogs who have debilitatingly short snouts, etc. are doing.
If anything, now that we can test, many people take steps to make sure their children don't end up with debilitating traits. Having back issues when you are 60 isn't even remotely in the same league as the back issues these dogs end up with.
Except maybe intelligence, I fail to see how the traits we breed for could be considered anything but deformities if a baboon had them.