How Mint.com Uses Messages (Email, SMS, Push, Etc) to Improve Retention
practicoanalytics.com
practicoanalytics.com
Half the charts and views are missing with no way to access things like net worth, change time frames for longer than 6 mo, filter to only chart things with certain accounts, etc.
It's all there on the web, but mobile has languished while they rush to get bill pay added. I'd heard rumors they were winding down the team but it has been over a year like this.
I've used mint for many years but have just about given up on the web UI. At least half of the time it pulls up the wrong account when I click on transactions or a chart doesn't load. The experience went downhill for me after their last major update and it's reached the point where I'm actively looking for a replacement.
I'd also argue that Intuit has focused too much on monetizing it instead of adding more value to the customer.
Kind of a chicken and the egg problem--you can't get a better product without resources, and you need to monetize to get those resources (or at least be confident that the returns will be there down the line). So what resources you do have inevitably go towards monetization since it is a lot easier to measure impact on growth than with many product improvements.
then citibank locked me out because they saw mint was continully trying to log in.
i am bearish on Mint because of this. they dont own the banks. sooner or later all the banks are going to block Mint
It gets better: if you have two-factor authentication turned on with your bank, you'll get text messages or phone calls every day in the wee hours of the morning, because Mint is trying to log in and update your account.
> sooner or later all the banks are going to block Mint
I don't think so - first of all, because I don't think the banks really want to block Mint. But even if they did, they couldn't. Intuit (the parent company of Mint) makes Quicken, which is very popular, and which already uses the well-support OFX protocol for synchronizing bank information.
The real problem is that, eventually, banks will try to start charging users to allow software like Mint to access their accounts (some already do this with OFX).
No standard will ever exist in the banking world because banks. They're their own worst enemy.
On the contrary, there will be many competing "standards" because banks.
Through chains of management and obsession over charts and bad metrics (like MAU) it's been my experience that the whole intent of building a great product usually gets lost by persistent opt-out messaging. And it's a situation where everybody loses out (because I uninstall the app, don't recommend it) and I get interruptions I don't want.
Now I recognize this article is specifically talking about pushes that do deliver some form of value, but what I don't see is any follow up research on whether ultimately these users are glad they got these notifications (or whether they feel stressed by them, or nagged, or whether they uninstall)
Looking at whether users like these kind of messages would be interesting. I personally turn off the push notifications but I enjoy getting the emails from Mint. I really dislike when companies don't give you an option for what kind of notifications you want to receive. I would imagine this is pretty similar for all consumers.
No need to use online financial aggregators, which are limited to certain financial institutions. Record your own downloaders and have them run automatically in your device. Can work in most countries in the world. Data and credentials are stored and encrypted locally. No need to give away your user names and passwords. No need to store your personal financial information online