Except all of the actual journalism being done on the Trump administration suggests incompetence, not malice, to be at the heart of its struggles.
> Except all of the actual journalism being done on
> the Trump administration suggests incompetence, not malice
I don't believe the journalists are incompetent. I believe there is actual malice there. No amount of incompetance can explain how they always say "muslim ban" and "7 muslim countries" instead of ever referring to the 'Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015' [1], where all of those countries were originally classified as 'countries of concern'.The 'journalism' shows large amounts of malice. It's not just incompetence.
[1] https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/02/18/dhs-announces-further-tr...
Are you aware that Jeff Bezos controls the Washington Post, and is rapidly anti-Trump? It is clear to many that the Washington Post has a leaning in all of it's political journalism that borders on MSNBC levels of bias.
Got anything else?
“I'll tell you the whole history of it,” Giuliani responded eagerly. “So when [Trump] first announced it, he said, 'Muslim ban.' He called me up. He said, 'Put a commission together. Show me the right way to do it legally.' "
Better source for you?