Feedback for your Job Interview from a candidate

Most companies do not provide feedback for a rejected applicant because it's a legal minefield. At best it's neutral. At worst, it's fodder for a discrimination lawsuit.

> However the second round of interview, which I wasn’t expecting a technical one, was opposite. Interviewer was extremely disrespectful. In the first second I understood that he was prejudiced and going to ask amateur questions from his manners. A guy, without smiling and showing that he is not happy to meet a “different” eprson to interview, is not an uncommon type of interviewers I encounter.

Why would a technical second round be unfair?

> Asking questions on paper with a bic pen is extremely unprofessional, also improvisating questions on fly without preparing them is too.

Every interview I've done has been with a pen in my hand. I usually have a prepared list of printed questions and make notes over the course of the interview, sometimes to add notes about questions I'd like to follow up on at the tail end of the interview.

> Other than that, asking syntax order of a left or right join, instead of the purpose of that to a candidate that says she worked one year as front-end engineer is forcing her to fail.

If the interview shows that the candidate can't express the proper syntax of what I assume to be is a SQL JOIN then I think the interview was a success on the part of the company.

> Aslo is extremely rude to comment, “oh you wrote a book about it explaining but you don’t remember the syntax?” with a mocking face.

That does seem pretty rude.

> Actually I am not interested with your company or your offer anymore, hence a accepted a different offer from abroad, I hope my feedback is going to be useful for your company, not to frustrate future candidates with your unprofessional behaviour.

This whole post, especially the last sentence, just sounds like sour grapes.