Review my Translation Site (#2)
caterpi.com
caterpi.com
So when I see:
'First available freelancer works on your order'
I leave. Tell me it's quick. Tell me it's easy. For whatever reason, that phrase just makes me lose all confidence in your site.
On another note. Are these translations audited? For an additional fee can I have another translator (maybe a 'senior' or 'trusted' translator) proofread them?
If it comes back good enough then I would accept it. If not I would ask for my money back. I wouldn't tolerate too many screw ups though before I went somewhere else.
If you translate "I won't take no for an answer" directly into Danish, you would get something like "jeg vil ikke tage nej for et svar", which isn't very good Danish though the meaning is quite clear. Translated back, it would give you the impression that the translation is excellent.
That's a good point. I've had some translations done through the site and needed to ask my native speaking friends if it was good quality.
For now, translators are untested as I don't have the resources to do it. There's the option of retrying the order with another translator or getting a refund.
It's the best I can do for now, and I'm keeping a close eye on any abusers/poor quality translators. There will be certainly something set up for trusted translations once the site is further on its way.
best of luck to you
You'll probably get the best quality by letting N translators translate a certain text, and let another translator select the best match, all anonymously of course.
1) There is no confirmation email. However, since you do not require a choice of a password when signing up, this is doubly problematic.
2) You place translator emails in the clear, even when not signed in to the site.
3) There is no way to delete an account.
4) You need to be clearer about your fees. State explicitly that there are no fees for withdrawal if there are none.
5) The best solution for a a verified translation would be to allow translators to post a review rate, and allow clients to choose their reviewer(s). This will not be a free service for any but the most needy of translators. Eventually, this could be integrated into the translation ordering wizard.
6) You forgot a language: Latin, which is critical for legal translation.
7) More important than age is education, but above all, you should require translators to post their mother tongue. It is also virtually required to state one's field(s) of specialization.
8) The site design is smashing, although the translator sort and filtering is weak (see note above).
It would be great if the translators were required to uncover information such as education and how old they are. It would also be great if you could filter out based on age and education. But maybe this isn't an issue if you have enough data and a good enough rating system...?
Anyhow, good luck, seems like a solid product.
This is my 10th design iteration so I'm glad you like it!
Thanks for the last round of advice for caterpi (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1267012)!
I've worked on a lot on design, bug fixes, and suggestions since then. Would appreciate some more advice especially regarding marketing/bootstrapping :)
Chris
One essential point... You don't see anything about the native language of the translators (and nothing about e.g. Brazilian Portuguese and European Portuguese). Also local languages are not there but might be in want. (If you put Esperanto in the list, better also Frysian for example)
But please try to find a way to not get details in the way. It's a nice and clean site and that's good :).