Just curious: in an ideal society, where there are no super large corporations that would abuse their advantage here, would this be a big deal?

Isn't this similar to the advantage that capitalists have when buying huge swathes of land? I imagine that if this passes companies would then start selling their "high priority" traffic to smaller companies.

I'm pretty ignorant to the history of Net Neutrality, but this seemed inevitable to me. Seems to me that every time there's a "constrained" resource (though internet access is arbitrarily constrained) large companies end up dominating it.

It sounds to me that the real problem is the existence of large companies that have the resources to exploit advantages to begin with.