If a gun manufacturer should be held liable for the results of people misusing a gun, then why shouldn't Airbnb be held liable for harm people may suffer as a result of renting or leasing through Airbnb?
If a gun manufacturer should be held liable for the results of people misusing a gun, then why shouldn't Airbnb be held liable for harm people may suffer as a result of renting or leasing through Airbnb?
They aren't.
But many say they should be. Simply because they want to drive the gun industry out of existence and outlaw private ownership of guns in the U.S.
And FTR, I normally would not favor regulating Airbnb out of existence. But I've had such a bellyful of Airbnb CEO Brian Chevsky's self-rightousness, that I would love to see him and his investors take a multi-billion dollar haircut.
The Democrats weaponized the federal government against their political enemies. I'd love to see them, and their supporters, get a taste of their own medicine.
I'm at a loss for how naive and petty that viewpoint is, and how drastic the unintended consequences could be. But hey, you stuck it to the man, good job!
Yep.
>I'm at a loss for how naive and petty that viewpoint is, and how drastic the unintended consequences could be. But hey, you stuck it to the man, good job!
Thanks!
I was kind of making a joke because to me the democrats have been largely ineffective against coal and guns. Thats not necessarily their fault, to me they have generally proposed pretty measured policies (even if some peoples rhetoric is bombastic) that end up being totally rejected by the republicans and my guess is that is NOT what you want to see happen with SV.
I'd love to see the value of their businesses destroyed through zealous over-regulation. I'd love to see the IRS target them for audits the way Obama's IRS targeted conservative groups. I'd love for them to be criminally prosecuted, and -- dare I dream? -- jailed for any violations of the tax code that might be uncovered. That would wipe the smug off their faces.
The political left in America no longer employs persuasion as their primary means of gaining and maintaining political power. Instead, they attempt to inflict social or financial punishment on their political enemies to shut them up. Recall the reaction when Peter Thiel had the audacity to support a presidential candidate they opposed. Google [memories pizza] for another example.
So if that is how the game is played these days, then I want the right to use the same tactics against the left, and inflict massive pain on them until they offer a truce.
I'm basically an Adam Smith free-market libertarian. I think the country, as a whole, would be better off if the cap on H1Bs was lifted entirely. Productive, tax-paying, wealth-creating people would flood into this country and enrich it.
But politics is war these days. And Airbnb is more than just an enterprise, it's a wing of the Democratic party. So I think the Republicans should, to paraphrase Obama, "punish [their] enemies and reward [their] friends."
You are right that politics is a war and ideologies are shouted but policies belie them to be empty promises. It is ironic that a libertarian is cheering on a protectionist administration to attack economically libertarian/neoliberal corporations (in the SV mold - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Californian_Ideology) who are aligned with a center-left liberal/socially liberal party.
I agree with every part of that statement except "the problem is."
>It is ironic that a libertarian is cheering on a protectionist administration to attack economically libertarian/neoliberal corporations (in the SV mold - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Californian_Ideology) who are aligned with a center-left liberal/socially liberal party.
These people are only libertarian when it benefits them personally. And now, because of that, so am I.
Massively increase their market size and profits? It's hard to argue that Obama was the best thing to happen to the gun industry in decades. Fire arm production in the US had DOUBLED since Obama took office.
Stock for Ruger has gone up 4-fold since Obama took office. SWHC was up 50% over its pre-Obama peak, but it dropped after Trump won the election.
> and coal industries
Competition killed the coal industry, so if you want to point a finger, you can blame the oil & natural gas companies that developed and utilized fracking techniques along with the solar and wind-turbine industries that have developed products that can produce electricity much cheaper than coal ever could.
Obama was just trying to get a few good blows in before The Market lands the TKO. He gets to take credit for defeating the coal industry, which looks good on his environmental record. But the writing was already on the wall for the industry.
You want more strongly written letters?
In 2008, candidate Obama remarked, “If somebody wants to build a coal-fired power plant, they can. It’s just that it will bankrupt them. … Under my plan … electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.” Four major coal companies have filed for bankruptcy in just the past 15 months.
http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/h-sterling-burnett/obama-d...
The reality is even without Obama's CPP coal is dying world wide, between china pouring billions into clean energy and the natural gas boom in the states coal can't compete.
It was the first result in a google search for [obama coal fired power plant]. I was just looking for that quote, and I found it. If you think additional context will refute my point, feel free to provide it.
Tell that to an unemployed coal miner in West Virginia with 5 kids and no other marketable skills.
And the point that I was making, and that you did not refute, is that the Democrats have done much more than send strongly worded letters.
I'm still going to have to disagree with you on that, the CPP is barely more than a strongly worded letter.
http://news.sky.com/story/airbnb-flat-owner-jailed-for-rapin...
http://www.airbnbhell.com/i-was-gang-raped-in-budapest-and-a...
Airbnb needs to be regulated in the interest of public safety.