If you start behaving like that, expect foreign governments/clients to ban/boycott american providers.

Jurisdiction is an important concept, and if the american justice starts using the good economic position of its companies to bypass or expand its jurisdiction, it should be expected that the feedback will effect said economic position.

While this case seems to be a bit different from the Ms case, the court essentially orders a private entity to take action in a foreign country, something which it could not do itself. This seems wrong to me. Instead, the issue is probably that this info should probably not be foreign if the producers were domestic.