Because there are actually a lot of people in Romania that across Europe to work for a lower salary and be totally content with that while I wouldn't? How free trade drives down labor costs when a government promotes an actual borderless free market? How it is an actually good business plan to go recruiting in Romania and other surrounding countries for both skilled and unskilled labor?

I don't know guys, I think you are attempting to censor reality by latching onto something that isn't even considered insensitive.

Disrupting free trade agreements like that disrupts cheaper labor. The same concept inflates the salaries within the United States as well with its limited visas and exiting trade agreements.

I see "standards of living costs are lower in those countries so it is rational to undercut the local workers" you see "he's saying they're beneath him". Are we really at an impasse? How deep in the gutter are your minds

Indeed. Also I wanted to point out how ironic that while one implies that others are below him, the very sentence carries the exact opposite meaning of the intended meaning.