In what way are the genitals of a programming blog author relevant?
In what way are the genitals of a programming blog author relevant?
Contrary to the implicit assertion you make, nothing -- not even programming (and writing about programming especially) -- is inseparable from identity. Consider, for example, that where someone grew up is likely to influence how they think and write about programming. Why would gender not also have an influence?
209 unique males were mentioned 280 times
21 unique females were mentioned 26 times
Excluding GP's comment 14 unique females were mentioned 18 times
That ratio of 209 male voices to 21 female is the reason the genitals of a programming blog author is relevant.
*There were 11 mentions where I was unable to definitively determine gender.
There are studies who say that 90% of developers are male.
10% from 209 is 21.
Isn't a list like this the exact opposite of that?
It is an attempt to normalise the idea that non-male programmers can work and communicate competently in their field. Whether you like it or not, certain elements of the technology community implicitly or explicitly reject this idea.
If this idea is normalised, then finally 'gender will not matter'.
Women in IT talk about how hard it is for them not to be judged by their gender but by their skills and yet many of them promote their gender as if it's more important than the skills.
* http://mina.codes/# (extremely so, if I may add)
The best programming girls are usually the ones that don't waste their time with this representation of their gender.
I'll bet some of them talk about gender/feminism/discrimination/etc because of men still calling them "girls".