Hacker News Reader

GitFlow and it's derivatives have very poor handling for continued bug fixes of old released versions. It might be great for a truly continuous model such as Facebook and Gmail where there is only "one true version", but in a case where there is a current version and three old versions requiring bug fixes, it fails miserably.

View on HN

I've implemented GitFlow with multiple support versions. We just added a "version" dimension to each of the main branches.

1.1/master 1.1/release 1.1/development

1.2/master 1.2/release 1.2/development

When we fix bugs in 1.x, we work off 1.1/development and merge into all later versions.

This doesn't fit for a "web" or "continuous delivery" model. It does fit very well for software houses with many customers on 6 monthly upgrade / development cycles.

I'm not talking about git flow.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com