Hacker News Reader

Comment by bweitzman | Hacker News Reader

They're also leaving themselves open to MITM attacks, where an attacker could change all of the tor addresses.

(SecureDrop developer here) That's why we created https://securedrop.org/directory (HTTPS, HSTS, preloaded, .onion available, etc.). Use that instead! Also, we have strong recommendations for the news organization's "landing pages" (e.g. https://theintercept.com/securedrop/), including requiring HTTPS, to prevent this and other obvious security issues.

This a shameless plug?

At least he was upfront about it by putting a disclosure in parenthesis.

Even SSL sites are not immune. On corporate networks, the clients trust the company cert, which is used to proxy all traffic (including HSTS and HPKP/pinned sites) for filtering/logging.

If you don't trust the machine you're currently on then it's already game over from a security perspective.

Isn't the actual content of the page signed by the the site's certificate though? And they can't just serve a different certificate because your browser can tell whether or not it was issued by a trusted CA. How does the attack work in this case?

Edit: Nevermind — I assume you're referring to this scenario[1], in which the company installs a root certificate onto your actual computer that allows them to sign certificates for other sites.

[1] http://security.stackexchange.com/a/63306

A lot of corporate computers have at least an additional CA authority on each computer that they use... if you're using a corporate computer, it's really easy for them to MITM any request, just relaying requests to the public resource, then proxying and using their CA signed cert in the proxy.

From there, everything can be tracked.

If you have a corporate computer, you shouldn't rely on any expectation of privacy. There's nothing stopping them from installing other monitoring software—screen grabbers, keyloggers, etc.—whenever they please.

That's where something like Tails comes in handy. :)

I don't think Tails would work because a corporate proxy would likely block any outgoing connections. Also most corporate IT policies would probably disallow running something like Tails.

That's working. If it fails secure it's keeping you alive.

Monitoring hardware, then.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com