Rate my new startup, Appointment Reminder
kalzumeus.com
kalzumeus.com
A funny HN story here: back in my last month or so at the company, when the seeds of this idea were germinating, I was going to call this NotiPhone, but had some minor worries about Apple going after be for selling something that was not iPhones. I had mentally gotten over that and was going to register the domains as soon as I got back a three day stint at the office... and on the last day, Notifo (YC10) launched. Going with NotiPhone struck me as professionally discourteous so I went back to my old trusty generic.
(I did end up buying the domains eventually because, hey, you never know.)
I wish you the best of luck.
"we"? Aren't you alone in this venture?... Or it's just a "professionalness" thing? I'm kind of torn between "I" and "we" for projects completely made by just one guy...
Note that I already had three freelancers working on this, so it is literally accurate, if you're feeling dissatisfied by that explanation.
Patrick, ever A/B tested the I/we thing?
You know, I do get a personal call from my dentist, carpet cleaner, and my kids' doctor before an appointment. I call my customers before meeting with them too.
But what a waste of time for all of us right? Why not send out this automated voice mail message instead:
"Don't be late! I don't have time to call you, but you better have time to meet and PAY me."
Nice.
I think you'll be able to sell it, but it seems like a DIS-service to me.
Also, NOTHING pisses my wife off more than a voice mail from an automated system.
Just yesterday she got one from a local service we donate clothes to (pretty sure it was them again), and she let out a throaty roar in the kitchen because she hates them so much, she wants a different service now.
That said: we get automated calls from a couple of different things in our life, and while I can't say that I love the calls, they are effective --- they actually change behavior.
That being said, when we bought a stove at Home Depot, we received a personal call from the truck driver delivering the product to see if we were ready and where would be the most convenient place for him to carry it into the house.
So, automation probably does work sometimes, but if it's not all the time, then it's just an administration problem (as noted in the thread above)
If you get 10 customers a day, you treat each one like they're a duke; if 100 a day, each one is made to feel like a person. 1000 customers per day are a vague blur, an avalanche of humanity of whom only occasional glimpses are clear, 10,000 customers a day is statistics, and 10 Million per day is an abstraction.
Different businesses deal with different customers and different customer volumes change the shape and functionality of the organizations that serve them.
The question for you is, at what scale does a business built on somewhat random customer service experiences work?
The American Massage Therapy association has 57,000 members. Massage therapists are a small portion of the overall personal/professional services industry. 57k / small number = big number. Does it matter if it is 400k or 4 million or 40 million? Not to me. (If I was going for VC, yeah, there are 40 million -- you can see it right here on this chart in the up and to the right portion.)
That said, perhaps a good balance would be for the business to integrate their policies with a system like this: allow customers to exempt themselves from the reminder system either in part or in whole, and then make sure those customers get charged extra if they miss an appointment.
When you book an appointment with a service provider, service provider cannot book anyone else, EVEN if some other customer is interested to obtain their services at the same time.
But I hate interruptions. Make the interruption as quick as possible. To me the advantage of getting a recording is the minimal interaction. I don't have to exchange greetings with a robot. So make it fast.
I may not be representative.
I would just want one additional feature: allowing people to opt-out. A lot of appointments are recurring, take hair-cut for an example. This will work effectively for the first time, however some customers (who actually remember appointment) may started fearing that they would get a useless call even though they perfectly remember where and when they need to go.
So, a simple Press 7 if you don't wish to have automated reminders next time will be a great addition.
We recently set up a free diet program that also involved behavioral change. The conversion rate on the site in terms of signups were great (about 70% actually). We were also tracking a couple of products that were integral with the diet that we referred our customers to and the sales weren't quite close to matching the numbers we were seeing.
Long story short, we tried asking for phone numbers, and those who provided were given calls a couple of days after signing up, and the response rate has shot up exponentially, including sales of the products. The people didn't mind the calls either, even after we asked if we could call them once a week to follow up on progress.
Of course, these were personal calls, not automated ones.
Email reminders are also automated, yet you are more likely to miss it because we're not glued to our monitors 24/7. A phonecall however is more likely to get your attention. There's been many times I've missed or forgotten something that could have been prevented with a short call or text message.
An idea to counter this would be soothing and pleasant voice templates that may disarm those easily set off by automated voice systems.
You do? Must be a American thing. I never ever heard of that.
Everything is white-labeled, but if you like I can ask my dentist who they're using.
As someone else mentioned, his monthly enterprise account seems priced too high. You can buy full practice management software for this much.
I'd love to hear more about your struggles with this, Patrick. I suspect this is an undertreated topic.
bingocardcreator. appointmentreminder. These names leave little doubt about what it's about. I've also noticed a lot of TV shows do this very well too: Undercover Boss, Pawn Stars, Desperate Housewives.
So what should the rest of us do? Go with a "trusty generic" so we don't have to lose attention trying to explain what it is? Or come up with something short and slick, with far fewer SEO synonyms?
I'm guessing you'll have to rely a lot on your AdWords kung-fu that you talk about so much, because I think customer acquisition is going to be your toughest challenge.
Edit: Actually, I partially take that back. The ads look competitive, but the results look penetrable. Your blog post announcing the site is already #21 for that term, so you appear to be in good shape.
Edit 2: Although you may do well for SEO, I can't help but wonder if you're taking a hit on word of mouth sales with such a generic name that doesn't use a .com. "Have you tried Appointment Reminder Dot Org? My sales increased 10%!" It make work, but I think you're putting all your eggs in the SEO /SEM basket.
I'm really interested in hearing what the content marketing angle is for appointments though. Bingo cards had a natural content fit.
If I figure one out, I'll tell you. This is one of the things I'm less than sanguine about.
Also, for what it is worth, in this user's opinion:
1) I'd prefer you disable or hide (probably disable) the green scroll arrows when you are already at the edge of the ribbon. (Ie., when you are on "Apppoinment Reminders" the arrow on the left is gray and disabled while the one on the right is green; when you are on "Who is it for?" the arrow on the left is green while the one the right is gray.) The infinite loop aspect confuses and annoys my reptile brain. I expect to see new content when I click "next". (The fact that your image is a placeholder may be making this worse for me. If I saw the same image crop up again it may be more obvious that this is cycling.)
2) I'd make more of each column on the pricing page clickable. Maybe it just that I'm using a short screen, but scrolling down to the "Sign Up" link seems a pain, especially when it looks as is if "Small Business" is already selected due to the highlight.
3) Personally, I really dislike the green of the Small Business column heading on the pricing page.
Since you're keen on testing, have you user tested the pricing page yet, or is this just a first cut?
Otherfolks have pointed out that there are competing services. I think the secret here might be to be friendly, non-technical, and drop dead simple.
One thought - this is something that's very valuable, but I do hope that you've considered selling this (at full price) as an addition to existing reservation systems. Asking service professionals to switch reservation systems is a very large ask; perhaps your $669/mo plan overlaps with that segment enough that it's not an issue. Even outside healthcare, my barbershop has a pretty tricked out system installed already. So I think you're going to have more $9/mo in your mix than you do, but I'm excited to see the data.
Also, I think there are many, many people who would love to fete you at a meetup. Please do consider publishing your American travel plans to us HNers so that we may ply you with beer and learn the dark arts of keyword research and other internet marketing ephemera.
Here are a few available .net/.com domains that you can get now, w/ # of exact match searches per month:
appointmentletter.net - 9,900
appointmentcard.net - 1,000
salonappointmentbook.com/.net - 1,000
appointmentremindersoftware.net - 1,000
appointmentletters.net - 880
appointmentpower.net - 880
salonappointmentsoftware.com/.net - 880
appointmentreminderservice.net - 880
onlineappointmentscheduler.net - 880
appointmentsystem.net - 720
appointmentbooksoftware.net - 590
automatedappointmentreminder.com/.net - 390
The next time you get a haircut, can you do me a favor? Ask your stylist "What is a domain name?" and "What is the difference between dot com and dot O R G?"
But you've written some pretty great stuff on SEO, so this is just for the benefit of anyone else reading this. :-)
It's not hairdressers you need to worry about, it's Google...who simply won't rank you in top positions.
Like saying there is carbon in a water molecule, this is simply not correct. com, net, and org domains all get the exact match bonus in the US, and orgs are not noticeably weaker than coms given equivalent link equity.
A .com with 0 link building will almost always start off on page 1 or 2. Even for a competitive keyword, at worst you are looking at page 3.
A .net or .org will usually start off on page 40.
After 2-3 weeks of link building, with a .com you are looking at a top 3 position. With a .org, after 2-3 weeks of link building you'll be lucky to climb up to page 2.
A .com will always be king, it's the most valuable domain name for a reason.
http://www.google.com/search?q=travel+blog
Now find travelblog.org on that page.
Go search for travelblog on google.co.uk, and it's in the top 3 position.
And sure travelblog.org is #1 there too, but the .org is a PR6 website, while the .com is a PR4 website. That's orders of magnitude higher.
The fact that a .com often ranks higher than its .org equivalent has nothing to do with it being a .com, but rather that its owners have done a better job of building it into a relevant site. You're seeing correlation, but not causation. As you correctly observe, PageRank and other SEO factors are the important thing.
Here are a few more examples of the same principle in action:
http://www.google.com/search?q=wikipedia http://www.google.com/search?q=slashdot http://www.google.com/search?q=php
Same SEO methods on a .com and .net, will always have .com beating out the .net.
All those examples you give, there is no competition, those are BRANDS that choose to reside on a .net/.org domains, there is no wikipedia.com trying to outrank the .org.
We are not talking about brands here. We are talking about keyword centric domains that are targeting keywords people actually search for. So to give you an example, you should be trying to find a bluewidgets.org that outranks a bluewidgets.com, where bluewidgets.org has the same or lower page rank.
Simple experiment, buy these three domains:
hgjhsushrdksjhfkshfkshf.com hgjhsushrdksjhfkshfkshf.org hgjhsushrdksjhfkshfkshf.net
Link them on a single page somewhere, wait Google to index it, and search for "hgjhsushrdksjhfkshfkshf". What tld will Google show first?
But if the .org or .net have a couple good links from somewhere else, they will rank higher. So, you're right on your pure domain keyword ranking, but I am from the opinion that it doesn't matter if you're going to use additional SEO techniques.
.com .net .org worked equally well in getting ranked for the keywords in that domain.
A lot more people buy .com domains. So we see a lot more .com rankings higher up in the search engines.
But as far as my personal tests and experiences show, keyword.org will work as well as keyword.com in getting ranked if the same amount of link building is done for both of them.
The only downside of a .org is - if you plan to sell the site or the domain, a .org gets a lower price than a .com. But from search engine point of view, both work equally well.
- Remindery.com (available) - Appointmently.com (available) - Appointmentize.com (available)
<name-you-actually-want>ly.com or get<name-you-actually-want>.com
I kind of like Remindery though :)
Wine from a winery, reminders from the remindery.
diction from the dictionary
... which informs me that medieval Europeans did not expect chicken from a chicanery. Drats.
http://www.apple.com/macbookair/
Using your value prop: "Stop losing money on missed appointments"
The biggest problem he seemed to have wasn't reminding people to show up; it was having a streamlined process for handling people rescheduling. Scheduling changes create drama for him by forcing him to renegotiate lesson times, and of course it creates bubbles in the schedule.
I might not completely understand the problems he runs into, but I think it could help.
It's very easy to track which customers are rescheduling. It may be the case that a timely reminder prevents them from doing so. So that's another technological response to the problem.
Here's another: it is probably the case that rescheduling well in advance is better than rescheduling late. The earlier you reschedule the more economic value your original time slot has. So, it may be that a nudge like this gets you to free up your original spot while it's still saleable.
Those are just random thoughts off the top of my head. I just don't agree that this basic business problem admits to no technical solutions.
One small nit: http://www.appointmentreminder.org/pricing says 'HIPPA compliance guaranteed'. It's 'HIPAA'.
It means that, if you don't see a check in that column, you're on notice that HIPAA compliance is not guaranteed. (Looking at my competitors shows that some invest a lot of effort into HIPAA compliance and some insist that it is out of scope for simple appointment reminders. My approach is a little different: I'll deal with the lawyers and regulatory angle, but not right now.)
If in spite of the plain language of the table and eventual language in the TOS folks insist on putting sensitive information on a service which is not rated for sensitive information, I'll say the same thing Gmail or Facebook would: I had no idea they were doing that, did not encourage it, and if you want to sue someone please sue them.
Reading over your response again it seems like you're saying that you're not doing anything to ensure HIPAA compliance and possibly that the HIPAA compliant premium option is only there to contrast with the other account types.
Is that right? If that's the case, why not just cover this in the TOS or with an on-page note like "NB: AppointmentReminder is not currently appropriate for HIPAA sensitive information." (Or some rephrasing of that that makes more sense.)
I'm confused why you're listing an account type you're not really willing to sell, or if you're intending to sell it, I'm curious what you intend to do to ensure compliance.
Of course, if you're not comfortable disclosing your plans here, or if you haven't yet figured them out, by all means disregard this question. I don't have any skin in this, I'm just curious.
Unless your competitors have significant secret sauce, playing catchup is a lot more efficient than leading. The unfair advantage that you have is the ability to ask your competitors' customers what they like and don't like about their products. Unlike the competition, you can add/remove features without pissing off existing users.
You may want to change your terminology there: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=massage+parlo...
The terminology difference is important to people in the industry but not always obvious to outsiders with less experience in the area.
I clicked first to your product site. It looks terrible. I almost thought it was a Web 2.0 parody site because of how poor the assets look. The green color of the background doesn't appeal to me at all. Try using a site like http://www.colourlovers.com/ to pick a proper color scheme. The gradients all have visual banding. The rounded corners are too much. The header bar is clearly influenced by Apple's website, but it looks worse - like a crappy knockoff of a genuine article. There is no catchy wording that explains (concisely) what is going to happen or what this site is. The typography is bad (no headlines? why?).
I clicked Try Demo. First thing I noticed was the calendar. I clicked around a bit on it and liked it, but I ditched the site right after that.
I went to read your blog post next. It all made sense, and I think you have a good plan. I just didn't get close to entering my phone number or experiencing the magic of having it ring. I know that would have impressed me a lot, and I think its not front and center enough. I went back to your site afterwards and I noticed that you have a big paragraph explaining the phone call demo on your calendar page. I had never read the text, I just skipped it and my eyes focused first on the pretty AJAXy calendar.
Try to emphasize the coolness of the phone call demo. Use nice typography and a catchy headline to call my attention to it. Go look at 37signals landing page again. "A better way to work". OK now I am intrigued. Definitely show off your cool AJAX calendar, but don't let it steal the show. The phone call is the magic. Emphasize that.
Hope this helps.
I was actually impressed by the appearance, and I don't see many other commenters italicizing their disgust, so this is probably an overstatement.
And one tech question: what are you using for the calendar? It looks beautiful, like a simple iCal.
And lastly: international phone numbers don't seem to work. I'm sure that's intentional, I just hope I didn't freak out some random person in Iowa reminding them about a fake appointment.
If I were a potential customer that were near that many (and that's only not even 40/day even with weekends factored in), I'd look at that and say "if we expand a little and cross 300/month, we're going to be forced into a plan that costs 7x as much and doesn't exist right now. That's really bad."
That or do some kind of "overage" deal where they can pay n cents per extra.
I'm also not sure how I feel about you not having the .com
Small businesses already have appointment scheduling systems. Do you plan on integrating with them? Or is Appointment Reminder meant to replace them completely? Or do you expect your users to manually input their appointments into two separate systems?
In my wildest of fever dreams, solving a revenue-draining pain point is enough to establish a beachhead in the B2smallB mini-enterprise environment, and then I get to eat the elephant from within. ("Since you're already using me for scheduling..." Basically, a 37Signals style approach where each additional product adds synergistic effects from existing customers plus marginal revenue.)
Who only has 10 appointments per month. And does a person with only ten appointments per month need a service to remind them of their ten appointments. Better yet does a person with only ten appointments have enough money to spend ten bucks on your service.
I can see charging extra for additional users, but the second user should be a discount not 20 dollars on top of the price for the first user. Your argument would be well they get more appointments.
Your appointment reminders give them unlimited appointments that are very low cost to your company. Then limit the amount expensive features per account like sms messages.
A teacher who does tutoring twice a week for extra cash. Typical rates at suburban schools last time I was in them were about $40 an hour. You can do the math from here.
Alternatively, a young professional who wants to put in reminders for himself.
the second user should be a discount
Why do you believe this? I get the sense that you're thinking there is some moral significance to a pricing table. I do not believe there is moral significance to a pricing table -- this is simply a pricing discrimination question, and if you have two people who need access to the same account you have just graduated to Definitely A Business and by implication have things like revenue, payroll, accountants, and money to spend on solving business problems which I am happy to take.
unlimited appointments that are very low cost to your company
I charge based on value, not based on cost. My customers perceive value from making appointments and having them kept. This is similar to bingo cards: the marginal cost of a bingo card is zero, but the difference in 15 cards versus 30 cards segments the market, ergo I charge to go from 15 to 30.
There are many other companies offering the same services to orthodontists, Televox is just one that I'm familiar with as my customers use them.
So - whether you hate getting these sorts of calls or not there's definitely an existing market for them.
God, I love the Internet.
Incidentally, the total cost of getting this project this far has been about $450, including $250 put on deposit for Twilio. (Better to have too much than too little, right?)
If possible, I'd love to read up on how exactly you moved from concept to product.
Do you have experience in B2B? Cold calling and searching for your customer instead of them searching for you? It's a very time-consuming task, much worse in support than B2C.
I don't know if this came across in my blog post: cold calling is not in the cards here. I think there is a market niche which exists where it is not profitable to do the cold calling, and believe that I can reach it with scalable approaches like AdWords and AdSense, in much the same way that I reached individual teachers because doing enterprise sales to their school districts would not have been possible.
Just looking at it, my instinct is saying "nah", so if I can retrain and learn some new stuff that would be very useful.
I think direct marketing (postcards, ads in trade journals, banner ads on trade portal websites) will work better than Adwords for this.
Because I think that your solution is something that a lot of businesses need and can get a benefit from. But its not a solution that all of these businesses search for.
So you will do better with a more pro-active marketing tactic. Take the educational approach - get case studies written about your first few clients - in their trade journals. Such a PR / case study approach will work better for you than Adwords.
If you could add a way for them to take appointments online that would be killer.
I actually built an application like this (but it was as a sub-contractor, so I feel no obligation to promote it here).
The application I built allowed users to set their appointment reminder settings to text and/or call their phone with an automated reminder message. I also made it so that if you hit 3 on the message (there were a few options, but 3 was my favorite), it would give you voice directions to your appointment.
Also, is your appointment reminder application HIPAA compliant? It definitely should be (http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/) since it deals with potentially sensitive health information.
The sales pitch is too long IMO. If you end up keeping something like it post-demo you should test alternatives.
The voice talkent is good. A bit too slow for my tastes but you need to do research here to see what people can handle for speed. Maybe faster with an easy "repeat" function. It always frustrates me when I miss something on a recording and can't replay it.
The synthesized voice is really bad. Recording a real voice for every five minute interval (or heck, everything) is not that bad.
I realize the recipient of the call is not your customer, but the faster you can get off the phone the happier they'll be and the cheaper it is for you. If I'm a business owner I'm thinking that people are going to hang up on this. Even though the actual reminder is short you're reminding people of a long call.
Minor "ad copy" bit: I think the people you areselling to are more likely to recognize something like "text message to your mobile phone" than "SMS".
You need some sort of easier way for this to spread. Perhaps that will naturally happen as customers hear about the product.
"I want to be able to say something similar to 'Appointment Reminder will pay for itself the first time it prevents a no-show.'" - despite patio11's humility about sales, this sentence shows he has the right instinct.
Also: I don't know who the target audience for the base-price is. If you know you have 10 and only 10 appointments per month, this plan may be fine, but otherwise? Why not change it to a "1$ for every appointment"-Plan?
target audience for the [personal plan]
Productivity bloggers. It exists to give my business something to offer them, because they have something I want, and it is not really their money. shh
If so, can a religious zealot / abusive ex-spouse / stalker / demagogue / etc use this system to contact their victim(s)?
While I trust you folks to not be abusive to verify this, if you were to attempt to put in the same number twice, you would get an error message telling you that to prevent spam that is not possible, but if you want to hear the demo again you can call a 877 number from the phone you want to unblock and then follow the instructions to unblock it.
That number is also the outbound caller ID for the demo calls, and explains that the demo call was scheduled by someone on the website, and if you received it in error we're sorry, etc, and you won't receive another one.
You'll note that the free demo doesn't allow folks to actually specify any of the contents of the call. (Well, technically speaking, you can manipulate the time, but that is it.)
Should some person use the paid version of the service in a malicious fashion, I'll do what the phone company would do: block their account and cooperate with the authorities.
Edit: looking at the HIPAA compliant feature I can tell you have done your research very well :). Glad to see you in this space. Looking forward to some "cooperative competition".
I see Appointment Reminder as a way to eliminate no-shows from people who forget their appointment (which I tend to do more than I'd like). Personally, I wish every business I made appointments with used this.
The idea is still good, but tweaking the messaging might make it better.
That reminds me, I need to finish that book. I believe it's on the Personal MBA list if that interests you.
http://www.amazon.com/Influence-Psychology-Persuasion-Robert...
Or is there another one you find valuable?
1) Redundant Scheduling
As an AR.org client, I would not revel in the idea of entering an appointment more than once; it also needs to show up in my normal "scheduling" calendar. Possible/partial solution: Google Calendar http://code.google.com/apis/calendar/
2) Zipcar - example #1
They have a very effective implementation of an app that schedules/extends your car appointment via SMS. It has saved me a $50 penalty on more than one occasion.
3) Time Warner Cable - example #2
TWC has an automated call reminding customers when they have an appointment; may be worth investigating. Anecdotally, as a reminder, it has been most handy when an appointment was made a week or more in the future. Of c. 7 appointments over 6 years, I think it effectively reminded me to reschedule 1 of the two appointments I had to reschedule.
One last thought; two factors seem to be driving your choice of business: (1) a focus on under-served niches, parlaying your marketing savvy and (2) unsexy businesses, reducing the potential for competition from technically skilled entrepreneurs... a very practical approach! Anyway, best of luck.
Getting tiny businesses like a Salon to use a web app for scheduling may be very difficult. Many of them probably don't even really have a computer in reception. Maybe you could let them route calls to a phone-based scheduler (then email/SMS in the appointment to the staff).
Many of them probably don't even really have a computer in reception.
You're certainly correct, but the market is so much bigger than me that I expect it will not matter either way. We'll see if my prospective customers routinely bring this up as an issue over the coming months.
Idea #1: add a recurring feature. Where I can schedule a phone call or an SMS to be sent every week / month / year on a specific date.
Idea #2: This may complicate your pricing plans a bit. But you want to offer: $79 for first 300 appointments per month. 50 cents for every additional appointment.
Or maybe implement the credit system. Like how istockphoto.com does. $1 for every 2 credits (with a minimum $10 purchase). $79 a/c comes with 300 free credits that last for a month.
Such a pricing strategy helps you retain folks who don't want to or can't get stuck (because of policy) to a recurring payment plan.
Man, is that ever true, and something we Americans could learn from.
But $770 for a 45-minute dentist's appointment?! Is that normal in Japan?
None of the above is intended as a commentary on the relative merits of national health insurance.
I would also try offering a 15 day free trial for the businesses and sell packages on a quarterly, 6 month and yearly basis vs monthly.
That said, as I alluded to, I did not primarily include that plan out of a desire to sell it. It won't be available at launch: it just gives folks fair warning that the other plans are not guaranteed to be HIPAA friendly, and additionally makes everything else I sell look cheap by comparison to what the Big Boys use. As I mentioned, that appears to be essentially all of the space at the moment.
If you eventually want to compete with those guys though, wouldn't you rather have a significantly lower price to make people consider switching? Or do you think having too low of a price will make people dismiss your business as shady, unreliable, etc.?
This is why Twilio (and related technologies) are so awesome: it turns the humblest cell phone in Africa into something which, for all practical purposes, speaks HTTP.
The "Appointment Reminders" link below the slider should de-highlight when the user mouses over the link beside it, right?