"Mindstorms" by Seymour Papert is a good book regarding such issues.
"Mindstorms" by Seymour Papert is a good book regarding such issues.
In the UK, many people will happily say, "I can't do maths" or, "I'm no good with numbers". They're almost proud of it.
I've occasionally had shopkeepers be surprised when I've handed over coins so I get a round £5 back in change, yet it's expected that seven year old children can do this. What goes wrong?
Consider a clothes shop, with a sign: "20% off all marked prices!". I wonder how many people could say what the £50 jacket costs, or the £30 jeans.
Doing arithmetics in memory has little to do with being apt at mathematics.
It is offensive to people who have spent a large amount of their time studying the field. This would be like me saying "I conquered design" after learning about CSS floats.
Nobody who has truly studied mathematics would ever say they "conquered" it. The more you study math, you realize truly how little you know.
I would guess that if you were to ask the author, they wouldn't trivialize what one does in math grad school. The blogpost is probs best read as a personal story than a statement about math as a "discipline" at large.
I'm sorry that you were offended, math as a discipline is definitely misunderstood and the people working in it maybe moreso. They make contributions that allow truly cognition-breaking changes in other fields, and of course looked at independently the pure elegance and fun of it is beautiful...
If you have seen this beauty, why would you be mad at someone that dares to come check out your space? They are in awe at the art in your hallway (trigonometry) and exclaim "your home is beautiful." (discipline) Sure they haven't seen your pool and kitchen and everything else, but their compliment can still be met with gratitude.
In the space of eventually consistent communication among asynchronously thought-processing agents (aka. "Humans"), allowing for error induces less anger in general.