President Obama didn't create the ACA. Congress did. It was modeled after a system that works very well in Massachusetts and was developed by Republican, free-market think tanks.
And every Congress since has tried to sabotage it rather than fix it. Last I heard, the current Congress still doesn't have a great solution to solve the core issues. And that is after 40+ votes to dismantle it.
I think you mischaracterize the Democrats of 2009. There was a significant desire to push for "a single payer option" (a partial "universal healthcare"), but there was also severe resistance, even within the party. And Republicans largely didn't want to deal with any option the Democrats came up with.
I'm glad something was done, even if it was an imperfect law. It forced the issue to eventually be dealt with. I would have preferred that Republican Congress critters would have chosen to try and fix the law rather than sabotage it (they were largely waiting for Republican president that could get credit for fixing the flaws).
Republicans largely didn't want to deal with any option the (2009) Democrats came up with.
No Republican was even allowed to read the final bill before the vote. Do be fair.You must have missed the entirety of 2009 that extensively debated the topic with Obama very much gunning for universal coverage and the GOP very much trying that no one got covered. The public option would solve much of the current issues, but was shot down by the Tea Party. Same for expanded Medicaid to cover the poor, Republican governors refused to expand.
The ACA is far from perfect, but not because Obama wanted it to cover less.
He tried to include the public option but it only had 59 votes to the 60 required to pass it
It may have taken a couple of days but whatever.
Edit: Can anyone explain the downvotes please? A filibuster can be overcome by just siting and listening to the other side until they can no longer speak from exhaustion.
Say only 20 of the minority decide to be completely intransigent. How many weeks do you think it will take to exhaust them when they each only need to speak for ~9 hours a week to maintain the filibuster?
So 52 weeks later, maybe you compromise to get some things done (or maybe sooner)?
How old were you when the ACA was passed? I ask not to be snarky, but to see if you remember the huge fight that erupted over the whole thing. Go back and read some of the coverage of the time, and ask yourself if you really think that he would have had the political capital to push the public option through.
And they would have broken even on Risk Corridors if it wasn't for Marco Rubio.