That's impossible to measure, but the arguments you have employed regarding personnel changes do not demonstrate your point.
That's impossible to measure, but the arguments you have employed regarding personnel changes do not demonstrate your point.
What of the decision to not replace Matt with a specific role or person? Is that not interesting?
And, again, I mentioned many other observations, not just Amit and Matt.
Edit: If the primary driver was lack of expertise in the ML direction, Uber seems an odd place to land, doesn't it?
I work for Google but this is pure speculation on my part.
Again, Amit may not have been aligned with the direction they're taking search. That doesn't mean Google doesn't care. In fact, it could mean just the opposite.
http://venturebeat.com/2016/11/02/uber-is-rolling-out-a-big-...
https://newsroom.uber.com/inferring-uber-rider-destinations/
There's other references, but you get the idea.