Hacker News Reader

This reads like a law firm trying to trigger the Streisand effect, not sure why I should care

> 1) We didn't say we are suing JPMorgan. [Huh?]

Why the huh? The author's own point 1 implied the suit was against JP Morgan.

> 1) JPMorgan already has the document, so there is no element of surprise on the government's side.

Yes the author is asking for the document and believes it should be a non-issue because:

> 1) JPMorgan already has the document, so there is no element of surprise on the government's side.

To which the DOJ responds:

> 1) We didn't say we are suing JPMorgan.

Which is a bit of a confusing response.

Headline doesn't need the dollar sign and the word "dollar".

A $13B Complaint