But 4,000 uniques just isn't going to do it unless your site/service is TRULY viral. If it is, then you should be able to take off with 100 uniques just as well (if a little more slowly).
But 4,000 uniques just isn't going to do it unless your site/service is TRULY viral. If it is, then you should be able to take off with 100 uniques just as well (if a little more slowly).
Also, the traffic boost is probably ordinarily more than 4k uniques. We probably have a fairly big overlap with TC readers.
Regarding investors, I think you might be right there-- TC coverage probably helped our YC app, for example (you'd know more than I!). But, in conversations with investors, I've NEVER had one say "Oh yeah-- I saw you guys on TechCrunch." It's a nice bullet point in an email/execsum that lends credibility.
Arrington literally has talked about founders calling him crying and begging for coverage and busting into his house to plead with him. That just seems wrong to me.
We had been front page on Digg and that got us a crazy number of uniques, but the initial VC interest did not start until we were on TechCrunch and Lifehacker a week or two later.
We saw an additional ~2200 UVs for the site on the first post; ~12000 UVs for the widget (incl in post) and ~1000 UVs for the site on the second post.
To this day, we still have people e-mailing us (as a result of TC coverage) -- usually they want you use their service.