IBM's “Think” Motto in Chinese
languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu
languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu
In 1911 on a rainy morning, TJ Watson met with the advertising and sales teams at the National Cash Register Corporation (pre-IBM). Frustrated by the lack of new submissions Watson went into a tirade:
The trouble with every one of us is that we don't THINK enough. We don't get paid for working
with our feet - we get paid for working with our heads. Feet can never compete with brains.
Thought has been the father of every advance since time began.
Knowledge is the result of thought, and thought is the keynote of success in this business,
or in any business.
Any man on the selling force today could make two dollars where he now makes one, if he would
but THINK along the right lines.
It is our job to help the man in the field think right. It is our job to place make them
think about what a Cash Register will do for them.
'I didn't think', has cost the world millions of dollars.
Mr. Olwell, I wish you would have a big placard made with that word Think on it in bold letters,
and have it on the wall of this department tomorrow morning. I suggest also that we adopt the
word Think as a motto or slogan, keeping it before us at all times in as many different
ways as we can.
THINK is the original ABC. Think Alec Baldwin spittling on a bunch of sales guys not meeting their numbers in Glengarry Glen Ross and you've got it. It's not some lofty command to invent the future. It's an order to close more sales.A year later, Watson was convicted of anti-competitive sales tactics and sentenced to a year in prison. Two years after that he was fired from the National Cash Register Corporation and went to join IBM.
I remember being quite proud of coming up with a new report or some vba script to automate something.
I felt like I was one of the few actually "thinking"!
Later I realised that most people weren't interested in doing a better job, their sole focus was in protecting their job! The naïveté of youth!
"Penser" in french has often (but not always) more to do with remembering things than actually gaining a deeper understanding. "Pense à acheter du lait" would be "Don't forget to buy some milk".
I think "RÉFLÉCHISSONS" might be a bit closer to what the english THINK evokes for me. But then again I'm not a native english speaker so maybe I read a little too much into this.
"Think of the children!" => "Pensez aux enfants!"
I don't know chinese, but if 认为 translates to "consider", it could work in that context. "Consider the children."; "Consider the victims of war".
Maybe it's hard to associate it with that meaning because of subconscious association with Apple's "Think different", which is definitely closer to "Imagine".
A good example of the connotation of "认为" is "think" as in, "I thought you would have hired a better translator, IBM."
I'd use something more catchy such as "思通ハ達" :-)
Surprised that nobody at IBM thought of it.'
Edit: clarification
In French 'pense' really is the later. It doesn't have that reflective connotation that can be applied to it.
But I guess they nixed that one after considering how their adding machines were used by the Nazis.
Both 思量 and 考虑 as suggested in the blog do not work too well as mottos, I feel, as they lack in simplicity and elegance and work better as part of a complete sentence. 思考 is OK, but just 思 (as mentioned in one of the blog comments) could be even better.
Company budgets to translate a slogan can be in the millions of dollars, and the process takes months, for a reason. Major mistakes have been made.
Nike and Mcdonald's are well-known for mistakes translating their respective slogans in China [1]. Coke-Cola got things right (way back in the 1920's too!) but still famously got hurt in translation [2].
I don't know the details behind IBM's translation of "Think" here. I agree with the article the translation in the picture "认为" Rènwéi is not a 100% accurate translation of the original use of "Think" by Watson.
But a few things to consider and speculate on:
This is a picture of the IBM France office. Why is Chinese even on the wall in France. How seriously was this planned.
IBM has used different translations in the past. Like "Siwei". Why might it have changed.
When translating to Chinese how a word will sound makes a big difference. Often how a word sounds in Chinese is treated as more important than its definition. Seriously. For extreme examples see "ba" and "si". ba is good but si is not so avoid it [8]. Did the sound of "Renwei" over the sound of other words like "Siwei" play a factor in the decision? Maybe. I don't know...
Renwei spelled "认为" sounds like the word Renwei spelled as "人为". That word's meaning is associated with "man-made", "human effort" and "artificial". Also "renwei" is in the phrase "以人为本" or "yi ren wei ben" which means something like "putting people first". This is a phrase already loved and adopted by other companies (VW) and more importantly by the PRC government. Might IBM have wanted employees to read and understand the word "Think" but also wanted these other associations of Renwei? Who wouldn't want associations like a company that cares about its people...or a place where humans are "making" products like "artificial" intelligence...or a phrase where IBM can thank Chinese government officials for the inspiration...plus is still does mean "Think".
Speaking of the government, might there have been government pressure for IBM not to use corporate propaganda that could be interpreted as encouraging employees to think in a way that challenges everything or is disruptive thinking. Maybe a safer choice of "think" was to use a more "accepting" of what you are told definition of think...
Lastly, Thomas Watson specifically said he didn't want to define what THINK means, every and all interpretations counted, THINK is just some letters and employees need to learn and find out what THINK means to IBM and to them.
The translation could have been random or mistake or intentional. Pretty clear you cannot say it is wrong. I respect the article was written by a Chinese language professor at Penn maybe trying to teach students something about translation. But many of these students are going out into the business world and translation in international business does not work how it works in the Chinese language department of a university. Keep up the good work, but maybe next time loop in a Wharton professor too before writing something like this.
[1] Nike "Just do it" in China: http://brandchannel.com/2011/08/01/nike-uses-localization-an...
[1] Mcdonald's "I'm loving it" in China: https://chinaipr.com/2015/03/15/im-lovin-it-a-wrong-way-for-...
[2] Coke nailed the translation with "Ke Kou Ke Le" but the company had to address mistranslations: http://www.coca-colacompany.com/stories/bite-the-wax-ta
[8] "Ba" is the number 8 but "ba" also sounds a bit like "fa" and "fa" has among its many meanings "to become wealthy". So this basically seems to have led to a go all out use "ba" and the number 8 as much as possible. When it comes to translation if a company had a chance to choose a slightly less accurate word but it contains a "ba" sound, there is a very good chance they will choose that. "Si" is different story, I won't go into detail, but si means 4 and also sounds like words associated with death and punishment, in China avoid "si" and 4 if possible. Tons and tons of examples out there about how much the sound of a word matters. But the use "ba" and "8" has are the best: http://shanghaiist.com/2016/06/29/lucky_license_plate_backfi...