"Part of the suit has to do with the initial pitch video, watched by millions of people, showing off what appeared to be a Lily drone following users and shooting video. The drone responsible for all that fancy aerial work and video was not in fact a Lily, but a DJI Inspire, something the creators failed to mention."

Very interesting. Assuming I'll get my refund soon -- I'll be applying it to buy a DJI Inspire. There's a certain justice that Lily's lying will lead to a boon for DJI.

Also: "One, the FTC’s Mail Order Rule, required that, if a pre-ordered product is seriously delayed, the company must issue refunds unless customers indicate they don’t mind the wait. Lily certainly must qualify as having encountered long delays — from February 2016 to “later in 2017” — but refunds were not issued at large."

I hope that the district attorney also confronts Lily on how, up until mid-December 2016, they were still promising shipments "soon". An obvious lie now.