Chris Lattner on Twitter:
>My decision has nothing to do with "openness". The "friend" cited is either fabricated or speculating. Folk just want to make [apple_emoji] look bad. [angry_face_emoji]
>My decision has nothing to do with "openness". The "friend" cited is either fabricated or speculating. Folk just want to make [apple_emoji] look bad. [angry_face_emoji]
Business Insider is not the New York Times, but even they would not openly fabricate a source [1]. My guess is they ran a story with an actual source, but the source was speculating.
[1] Outright making stuff up is the definition of fake news. 100% made up.
Fake news would not talk about who their source is. Fake news would not publish Lattner's denial.
There is a difference between fake news and second-rate journalism. If someone doesn't think there is a difference, I'm guessing they also see the world in black and white.
Fake news - news that has wrong info as facts or provide something as sourced when the original source never said that.
I think that's rather huge difference (speculation from some outsider can still by chance be true, fake is by definition false)
> "Eventually I know that can really wear people down."
That doesn't say s/he knows it wore Chris down, just that it could have.