How Should We Donate $53,000 of xkcd Book Profits?
breadpig.com
breadpig.com
If $5k seems too low, then maybe have five $10k projects or some other mix. In a way, this would be a gift that keeps on giving.
2 years ago when I started breadpig, I had ambitions for a vague 'breadpig prize' -- what your proposing is a much more concrete idea. It's great and I think you're absolutely right on with this (and would love to have your help in the near future, if you're up for it). I'm officially retired from reddit, tho, so there'll probably be no blog.reddit takeover ;)
But I do like this idea. I'm proud to be one of the AwesomeFoundation trustees; the org itself is nothing short of awesome: http://awesomefoundation.org/
Creating something with a more 'help the world' bent would be great, especially if it's software-based. To even play a small part in starting the next Ushahidi...
We did the same thing with LOLmagnetz (for the SF SPCA) so that more dogs & cats get adopted, creating more dog & cat owners and thus more potential LOLmagnetz buyers.
Literacy is a good cause. If I was in your position, it would be hard for me to pick a specific cause like literacy over saving the most human lives per dollar.
Out of all the developing country education charities, Givewell rates Pratham highest. http://www.givewell.net/international/charities/pratham Have you considered them for the next Breadpig book project?
Ok, I am just kidding :). Its hard to vote on donations like this because I am sure they could all use some help, so I only voted for the countries and causes I am more aware of.
Your money will make more money and grow.
If you mean people on Earth right now... at a death rate of around 150,000 people per day, assuming 7 billions alive right now, that gives about 500 days before 1% of the population dies, and it needs to benefit everyone else.
Death rate citation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortality_rate
However, the point is MOST EVERYONE dies from something that's a result of getting older, and they'll benefit from age related research.
Most cancers even can't actually progress until older ages, as younger peoples' immune systems are so much better they typically fight off the disease.
Here's a pretty good TED talk on it. http://www.ted.com/talks/aubrey_de_grey_says_we_can_avoid_ag...
For all de Grey's antiaging speculation, Dean Kamen's external combustion water purifier has the potential to benefit poor people who die young this year, not rich people who live a long time 25+ years from now. On the "where should we donate money now" question, de Grey's ideas are very distant with no clear paths to their realization.
And if you include speculative future technologies then Eliezer Yudkowsky's arguments for pushing AI development seem fundamentally more compelling than de Grey's argument for pushing antiaging research. Not that I can ever find specific Eliezer writings when I want to link to them :/