Respectfully I disagree. Yes, there is higher information density, but it is about information which actually obscures and hides important knowledge (information with context) and discussions which people need to have.

I say this because the only reason this article exists is due to Thiel's support of the Trump administration, and thus his association with it's controversial (the wall, deporting muslims, etc) policies and Trump's controversial public statements and persona.

I would have preferred to see substantive questions addressing this stuff posed. Maureen Dowd was interviewing one of the most powerful people in the country.

Instead, we get information, but the value of that information is questionable.

I read the interview as "normalizing" Thiel - like, "Hey, this guy likes stuff to!"

Nothing inherently wrong with that but the Fourth Estate needs to do more.

Agree that the format is dense, but most of the content is complete drivel. I'm surprised to see this on the front page.