China drops Dropbox
forums.dropbox.com
forums.dropbox.com
One upside is that Chinese people seem to be a little more tech savvy. ie. many of them are forced to learn about proxy servers so they can go around the blocking.
Edit: By Chinese facebook, I meant the Chinese CLONE of facebook. Facebook itself is totally blocked in China.
That level of censorship boggles the mind...
http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&prev=_t&h...
http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&prev=_t&h...
According to wikipedia, this is on the 12th most popular site in China.
I think the censors operate on very crude keyword filters. As long as you avoid the few obvious keywords, it's not that easy to get caught. The domestic web sites get around the censor by agreeing to open backdoors for the filters, yet at the same time turn a blind eye to the real disruptive stuffs that got around it.
But it's a pretty bad sign when, seeing someone use the word "freedom", your immediate reaction is suspicion, trying to decide whether or not it shows that the speaker is an enemy. And that's how it must be for the Chinese internet police who make decisions like this one.
http://www.startbreakingfree.com/
A real hot bed.
First users were forced to use a relay, then relay IP's started getting banned, and now I think that the government has found some method to prevent connections to the Tor network completely (I'm not sure how).
Slowly but surely the screws are being tightened, more and more of the western net is becoming unavailable. I guess already 30-35% of all sites linked to on HN are blocked.
So if it does get blocked its not for long.
I wish I could help you with more specific information off the top of my head, but I fortunately don't have to use relays. I am willing to do some research and share the results here if you like.
When such a post is removed, it's typically referred to by netizens as being "harmonized", a play on Hu Jintao's "Harmonious Society" slogan [2].
You should check out the archives of a site like chinasmack or chinahush[3], who have translated summaries of popular chinese message board topics and gives a good feel of the day-to-day life of a chinese netizen.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/50_Cent_Party
On the other hand, our website is bilingual, and we don't really need to monitor the english part since the government doesn't care...
OTOH, this means that Dropbox has obviously gotten big enough to be a threat to the authorities.
Regards.
Generally speaking if it's because of a local competitor (eg youku or renren (vs youtube or facebook)) I would not hold my breath.
The desktop client could even serve as a local proxy server for web/forum access.
All of which is non-indexed and not easily tracked.
Im guessing it's become a distribution method for information they are not keen on (or they feel it will be).
In a sense it was only a matter of time :(
http://www.kylin-os.com/products/os/features.html#googtrans/...
If you use Chrome, it has an auto-translate feature that works pretty well.
If you want to target China as a market, you have to have a company there and pay into the system to play. You don't get to run your U.S. or EU web site and have users/revenue grow in China without taking a chance that you will get blocked. Them's are the rules...without regard to censorship...China takes care of China.
We need to push our representatives to call foul on WTO violations. These are unfair business practices as web-based companies need to be protected too.
It's all about "block and copy" so the west is losing precious resources and hard-earned IP.
The Chinese government is hurting China a lot more than it's hurting the west.
As to it being identified as a 'circumvention device', there are many reasons why it could have been blocked...some automated methods and some that require a person. It could be as simple as someone published a file with certain keywords in it and that file link got posted in a few places...then bam...automatic block. We don't know the rules to the system. And there are actually several systems, run by different government departments...with support from many more non-government employees of web sites.
• Up until this point, the whole Google fiasco has been settled quite well.
1. Google didn't want to remain in China and be forced to censor content. Check. 2. China didn't want to make an exception. Check. 3. Google still has a presence in China and doesn't have to filter its content. China hasn't lost face and been forced to make an exception. Check.
Even though it's not ideal and the service gets blocked sometimes, I sense that China and Google came to an agreement together that Google's move to Hong Kong would be the most appropriate thing to accomplish the two seemingly contradictory goals. You will note that if China didn't want Google at all, they would've blocked Google in HK from day one. That's not to say that Google will never be blocked, but at this point it's safe to say that the government does not see Google as a big enough threat to warrant being blocked.
• Could DB do something similar? Maybe. It seems that DB would have to reach out to the Chinese government and cooperate to some degree in a sign to show that there is a desire to be in China. Then, like Google, they could choose to pull out to HK, where hopefully there would continue to be this unspoken agreement to let foreign companies be. This might backfire in that the government might just pull the plug on all foreign companies in HK, feeling that the initial overtures were superficial and that there was just a desire to be given a certain level of access in China without having to abide by the other stipulations that other companies have. If DB chose to try and cooperate with the government, this would lead to some form of censorship (either by DB, the government, or by the users themselves) thus defeating some of the benefit of using DB. DB is fundamentally different from the service that Google offers, though, so following Google's path might not work.
• This whole thing makes me sad. Chinese culture is fundamentally different from Western culture. That doesn't justify certain things but you'll have to talk to people (real people…not just read chinaSMACK) to understand better some of the reasons for these policies. The point is, though, that the Chinese government is dealing with a different set of problems with a different set of values than other Western governments. Until there are some changes in the problems or in the values, we'll continue to see different permutations of these kinds of policies. I've also seen a pattern of non-risk taking behavior here. Policies like these discourage people take chances at producing great ideas. Most Chinese comp sci students want to get a good job at a stable company. From what I have seen, and I'm still learning a lot about tech here, the lack of the entrepreneurial spirit is related to a lack in the quality of programming. There isn't the same kind of cut-throat competition that I've seen in the States and this leads to less motivation for learning the best (or better) way to do things. There are obvious exceptions to this, but in general, the motivation for someone to set up their own business is very low. It's too risky.
Or if you're more into empiricism, install this http://chinachannel.hk/ onto Firefox (warning: isn't > 3.5 compatible).
Or you could come over to my apartment here in China and use my internet connection for a bit and commiserate with me.
Strange.
Here in the West we take the right to protest quite for granted, as this post demonstrates :)
Not ragging on you at all, really, but who exactly would the Chinese protest to? How would they do so? And what would prevent them from being jailed or worse for their efforts?
It's curious how Bush-bashing gets automatic upvotes even when it's completely irrelevant (in this point HN isn't much different from reddit).
The US has the moral high ground with regards not blocking Dropbox, Google Groups, Blogspot, etc wholesale within the country, but China has the moral high ground with regards not invading foreign countries simply because "when you can you should". As thiopental wrote: "It's futile to expect others to adhere to your moral standards (here: truthfulness) when they think you should clean up your own act first."
I know expats who are uncomfortable protesting openly against China because of this - to protest against China is to side with the West, and thereby tacitly support this sort of boogeyman tactic.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/8607769.stm
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/chinese-dissident-...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/24/nobelpeaceprize....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_dissidents#Chin...
Chinese dissidents seem to be in the news quite a lot to me, in fact it would seem part of the west's objections is due to the voices of some immigrant Chinese.
Although I'm not sure who would bother to do so...you can go to a government office and file a complaint without fear of being whisked off to a secret prison. Its if you're becoming a successful organizer of activists that you may end up in trouble.
As for the business restrictions, what can you do? I do admire companies like Google that can take a moral stand against Beijing's censorship.
That being said, if I were a dropbox subscriber and my ISP (or government... ::shudder::) blocked dropbox, I would know exactly where to place the blame. Thus, I wouldn't expect dropbox to give me a refund.