I was claiming that what thesimpsons1022 said was in fact bigotry. It wasn't racist bigotry, but it was bigotry against less educated, less "tolerant" (presumably = "subscribing to liberal values"), "rednecks".
Therefore, I was (implicitly) trying to say, your statement that "Being intolerant of bigots doesn't exactly make you as bad as them" did not clear thesimpsons1022, since thesimpsons1022 was being bigoted, not just intolerant of bigots.
I wasn't claiming that liberals were bigots about race, but I will accept your statement that the left also does racism. It wasn't my point, but I agree with you.
I'm confused by your first sentence. Are you saying that "voter turnout" (i.e., the recent election) proves that half the country is awful? Intolerant? Bigoted?
I am not claiming anything based on the election. More: I don't think that the election proves very much about the level of bigotry, intolerance, or racism in this country. I think it says more about how tired people were of establishment politicians in general, and of Democrats who claimed to stand up for the little guy and yet did very little about job loss in the heartland. In fact, my (perhaps rose-tinted) perspective is that Trump got more "Ugh, not Hillary" votes than he got "Yes, Trump!" votes.