Apple should make MobileMe free
ipadwatcher.com
ipadwatcher.com
Assuming you pretend the web hosting bandwidth, email accounts, sync services, etc., are free and the only cost is storage, it works out to about $0.30/GB stored, already not bad for a consumer service.
For me, instant and reliable multidirectional sync of any contact, calendar, and bookmarks data, across all my computers or mobile devices, is worth $8/month.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B001AMLRU4
$69.42 / 20GB / 12 months = $0.29/GB
Note: You can buy up to 100GB.
I have the same through Google and it's free. Apple is losing the cloud race badly, maybe free would help.
A number of folks I know use MobileMe to host websites for their domain and handle email for their domain. You do have to "bring your own" DNS.
Also, it's not free through Google, it's ad supported or $50 per year per user.
http://stevenf.tumblr.com/post/618349003/here-are-some-thing...
His summary: "If you’re contemplating this change, I highly recommend setting aside a few hours for research first. You may be unpleasantly surprised."
Some more issues are discussed in today's TUAW article, "Sync Wars: Address Book vs. Google Contacts":
http://www.tuaw.com/2010/05/22/address-book-vs-google-contac...
Then it's a shame the article can't come up with any. The ones listed are either guesses ("might sell more devices") or counter to Apple's established, and highly lucrative, business model.
The fact's are.. They wont. Remember, it's the small additions to sales that make sales highly profitable and if they made it free, people would probably register for many accounts and use them to host warez. The .Mac servers are already slowly crawling along. By making it free, they would probably grind to a complete halt.
The author also fails to recognise that unlike Google, Apple's core profit model isn't advertising, instead, Apple actually does the opposite (wastes untold amounts on advertising). So Google profits heavily from their web apps, whereas web app's actually cut into Apple's profits.
Great in practice, but in reality, terrible idea. In fact, I'd be as bold as to say this article is as terrible as the idea..
Do people host warez on Dropbox accounts (in the Public folder)? Those are free and easily obtainable en-masse; you don't even have to keep the files on your own computer if you unlink the account after loading it.
1) A slight jab at Google. Right now I have my mac address book, iPhone, and Google address book all syncing OTA. It was a bit of a PITA to setup, but works now. If Apple offered the same service for free I would most likely switch.
2) Making the service free could add another selling point for macs, iPhones, and iPads. A "buy this item and you also get into another exclusive club" type of thing. The problem with this reason is that Apple doesn't seem to need to do this right now since demand already seems quite high at the moment.
My guess is that mobile me will not be free anytime soon unless Apple rolls out some new base technology that requires MM to function.
making mobileme free would increase the usage exponentially. I don't even know how big it would be, but it would be big. if you go back two years you will remember that apple had a huge problem with mobileme at first. it's just not their core competency and something they want to deal with. when they are ready, they will make it free and do a damn good job of it.
they may also make this free to completely and utterly fuck with google apps (consumer side).
the cash doesnt matter. the revenues from mobileme are minuscule.
They could keep current subscription revenue, introduce a pared-back offering. All the while establishing a web channel for their Quattro Wireless advertising platform.
Would be a good hook for increasing MobileMe up take, takes a swipe at Google and keeps Apple customers in the 'walled garden' and out of the myriad of similar services that are popping up (e.g. Dropbox et al).