The point was not against forks but transparency and good faith. Open source is not just about forking but also contributing, no?

What have the forkers contributed to the product so far? Where are the technical reasons for the fork? Where is the community discussion and consensus? Has there been any kind of democratic action? So on what basis is the word 'community' used?

A fork shoud not simply be about people misusing the word 'community' for seeking control and ownership because that's not what open source is about, is it?