- Clients that don't already have their data in an inventory management system usually have Excel spreadsheets, so we can just export that to CSV, parse it, and stick it in the database.
- If they really have nothing (some commercial galleries, especially ones that have been around for 30+ years still do everything on index cards), then you can give someone a spreadsheet template to do the data entry into, and script the import step.
- Even if they do, when preparing data for import, it's easy for the clients to look through the data (and for us) to see potential errors/inconsistencies that need to be corrected during the course of importing.
- Small industry (data management services for commercial art galleries is maybe 2-3 companies in Europe, 1-2 in the US, and that's about it), all writing proprietary software, no semblance of agreed formats/standards. When a client quits one company and moves to another, it's easy to dump their data to CSV and leave the company doing the import to sort it out on the other end. Trying to piece together random-looking values across 15+ CSV files to see what the last legacy system meant by some string is a pain, but it's something that the client will pay for in most cases.
JSON might have been nice, but I can imagine it coming with its own trouble as well. CSV worked well since our tools would allow analysts to interpolate columns into the copy or key words when doing bulk ad creation. The nestable nature of JSON would have complicated the interface given to our nontechnical analysts.
I also imagine many of our clients wouldn't even know what JSON is.
- "CSV on the Web: A Primer" http://w3c.github.io/csvw/primer/
- Src: https://github.com/w3c/csvw
- Columns have URIs (ideally from a shared RDFS/OWL vocabulary)
- Columns have XSD datatype URIs
- CSVW can be represented as RDF, JSON, JSONLD
With CSV, which extra metadata file describes how many rows at the top are for columnar metadata? (I.e. column labels, property URI, XSD datatype URI, units URI, precision, accuracy, significant figures) ... https://wrdrd.com/docs/consulting/linkedreproducibility#csv-...
... CSVW: https://wrdrd.com/docs/consulting/knowledge-engineering#csvw
@prefix csvw: <http://www.w3.org/ns/csvw#> .
@context: http://www.w3.org/ns/csvw.jsonldPreviously I worked for a company that provided a dashboard for small businesses to manage their listings (Yelp, Facebook, Google, Tripadvisor, etc). For multilocation clients, for initial setup we needed a list of all locations, addresses, phone, etc., and not a single client said "here's our api, grab the data in JSON format". Instead, we always got a CSV. We eventually gave them a CSV template file for them to copy/paste into.
I'm guessing small businesses want to do integration with the web, but they didn't really have the engineers to do an API integration?
For example a lot of CSV data is used for plotting/visualization, because all they have is numbers. If they had more metadata they probably would have ported them to JSON.
Another observation: A lot of CSV dumps online are really that: data dump. It's a huge size file that's meant to be used after downloading, not for streaming like JSON/XML. You don't see many JSON apis that return huge size data, but it's common to see a lot of huge sized CSV files.
I myself have had to integrate with 3rd party logistics companies, and the way we got them to send out our inventory was to send them a CSV of our orders twice a day.
Tables of data are best represented with... well, tables of data. For data that's not nested it's a perfectly acceptable format. Importing well-formed (and there's the rub) is trivial and a well-known process.
.csv is like the lowest common denominator of data formats.
EDA tools often export BOMs as CSV, which we import to Excel.
ATE programs often export test data as CSV, also imported to Excel for manipulation and graphing.
No people still use the obviously superior format for structured tabulary data. Why would anyone use something that is highly suboptimal for things like these?
Its like when people starting saving photos as png because they read somewhere how "shitty" jpg is...