Donald Trump at #2. Not sure if that means people were trying to make his page more accurate or that people were trying to make his page less accurate.
I think the editors were just trying to keep up with the update of the campaign and the news.
Both?
It certainly must be both, which makes me wonder which how many of each. I wonder if text sentiment analysis is good enough to parse all of the 2016 edits and come up with an estimate of the political persuasion of each editor.
Yeah it has to be. We have certainly learned a lot about Donald Trump this year.
Compare Bill Clinton's articles with those from a couple years ago or so.