Matchmaker, find me a grant

No computer science yet :/ Finding grants and applying truly is a time sink.

Leo Szilard predicted it years ago:

> “but then why not do something about the retardation of scientific progress?”

> “That I would very much like to do,” Mark Gable said, “but how do I go about it?”

> “Well,” I said, “I think that shouldn’t be very difficult. As a matter of fact, I think it would be quite easy. You could set up a foundation, with an annual endowment of thirty million dollars. Research workers in need of funds could apply for grants, if they could mail out a convincing case. Have ten committees, each committee, each composed of twelve scientists, appointed to pass on these applications. Take the most active scientists out of the laboratory and make them members of these committees. And the very best men in the field should be appointed as chairman at salaries of fifty thousand dollars each. Also have about twenty prizes of one hundred thousand dollars each for the best scientific papers of the year. This is just about all you would have to do.

Also, a great example of solving a real, impactful problem. Why someone would invest in the thirteenth food delivery app over something to help science do science is beyond me.