Uber admits to self-driving car 'problem' in bike lanes as safety concerns mount
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
If anything, after hearing that Uber lost $800m in Q3, I'd say they want these self driving cars badly so they can finally become profitable.
Good luck for the others going from SF or London where biking is a sport for hipsters in special high visibility clothes, to Amsterdam or even worse... New Delhi, where people just cycle/drive far less concerned with how the algorithm thinks roads are supposed to be used. Or take Paris as another example of a much more "swarm" based approach to driving in very busy areas.
A big step for self driving cars is learning to deal with the chaotic approach that a lot of humans take, instead of the very wide lanes, slow driving (far slower than Europe, with generally a much bigger turn radius) and strict rules that the US is used to.
There's the danger to nearby people on foot or bicycle, and the prospect that they or their relatives will sue for lots of money. I very much misunderstand the differences between here and California, Open defiance of basic traffic safety tends to get shut down and taken off the road.
If a fleet of vehicles are deemed not safe to drive on the public roads, then telling the traffic authorities "as an important issue of principle, we reject your authority" it won't end with you driving them around freely, will it? And I would be surprised if you're allowed to drive them around freely while a court case is pending. Cars do get pulled off the road, impounded and towed.
It's hard to see how Uber thinks that this will go well. Am I missing something?